Air India plane crash

JordanD said:
I hate how often YouTube tries to push this dude’s videos on me. The most egregious one is that Irish pilot guy on there who talks smack about people’s landings. Can’t imagine being sad enough that that’s what I do on my days off.
Click to expand...
I crashed out and couldn’t handle it anymore, blocked him about a month ago
 
Old Boeing Driver said:
Has anyone thought/suggested that the RAT was manually deployed?
Click to expand...

If it in fact was, that is my baseline assumption. No evidence apparent in video to suggest some sort of catastrophic engine failure. Not that it didn't happen, but IMO nothing in this adds up to mechanical failure. Everyone talking about massive electrical system failure. I think people are reading too much into "FBW" and "Composites" and "new stuff" and maybe a little "well the 787 had some electrical gremlins in the early years". I could be wrong of course. But I have flown airplanes built by the same company, that have never had a total electrical failure in 28 years of service. Nor have the engines both shut down because of some weird electrical FADEC glitch. We have PMGs for that sh**. I'd assume an airliner certified to fly many more people than one has some redundancy. People are also not engineers, don't understand aircraft design or power distribution systems, and they also happen to want to blame Boeing for everything at the first opportunity. So color me a little skeptical on this one. It also makes me a little hot every time I read an article that begins with "in another set back for Boeing".......oh rly? Based on what, McKayla? Did your BA in communications a year ago qualify you to make that statement? GTFO and go back to quoting your NYC roommates about how home ownership is impossible
 
tcco94 said:
View attachment 84112

Wrap up the investigation! Captain Steve has it concluded!

What a joke the internet is
Click to expand...

I hate this. It's all for the likes/shares/subscribes.

You could actually call me an expert since I've been in aviation for almost 40 years and "have done some other stuff" at the Air Line. But I literally have no idea and no opinion on what may have happened. There are too many variables and you really can't judge based on grainy video, ADS data and literally you have to wait until the CVR, the FDR and digesting all the data before you know.

I'm sure Steve is a nice guy but at some point, he's got to turn off the need for traffic and serve aviation by admitting he really hasn't a clue any more than my non-flying, have-been-once-on-an-airplane mother does.
 
///AMG said:
If it in fact was, that is my baseline assumption. No evidence apparent in video to suggest some sort of catastrophic engine failure. Not that it didn't happen, but IMO nothing in this adds up to mechanical failure. Everyone talking about massive electrical system failure. I think people are reading too much into "FBW" and "Composites" and "new stuff" and maybe a little "well the 787 had some electrical gremlins in the early years". I could be wrong of course. But I have flown airplanes built by the same company, that have never had a total electrical failure in 28 years of service. Nor have the engines both shut down because of some weird electrical FADEC glitch. We have PMGs for that sh**. I'd assume an airliner certified to fly many more people than one has some redundancy. People are also not engineers, don't understand aircraft design or power distribution systems, and they also happen to want to blame Boeing for everything at the first opportunity. So color me a little skeptical on this one. It also makes me a little hot every time I read an article that begins with "in another set back for Boeing".......oh rly? Based on what, McKayla? Did your BA in communications a year ago qualify you to make that statement? GTFO and go back to quoting your NYC roommates about how home ownership is impossible
Click to expand...

For folks on this forum, isn’t it kinda understood that there’s a parenthetical premise? It’s likely pilot error but if it’s not …

I would assume there’s adequate battery power that would preclude the need to deploy the RAT before achieving positive rate of climb. The RAT deployment might be among a number of puzzling crew actions.

I have a feeling that Boeing is going to escape unscathed from this one, but I’m often wrong when speculating without adequate information.
 
Any chance of 200 ft set in altitude window, takeoff and immediate capture, enter alt hold and speed mode. Climb through 200, going up, confused, hit level change thinking it will give max climb power in climb out. But because selected altitude is below their current altitude (Asiana), engines go to thrust idle, open descent. High AOA, descending, alt acquired at 200, engines start to roar back from idle, but too late. Sink rate already established and ground contact.

?
 
Skåning said:
Oh FFS just say who it is. Why the mystery
Click to expand...
That was intentional, I rarely see anyone using real names here and figured that was standard practice. If youre familiar with these internet talking heads then it’s really not difficult to know who I’m talking about. If you’re saying I won’t get any blowback, then its CW Lemoine and yes he brings Mover on his channel very regularly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top