bbmikej
Well-Known Member
I think the RAT speculation comes from the sound which sounds identical to known RAT deployment. Could be something else but to my ear sounds like a match.
I guess I just have no idea what the RAT sounds like.
I think the RAT speculation comes from the sound which sounds identical to known RAT deployment. Could be something else but to my ear sounds like a match.
I've done the ops test on Bombardier Global RATs in the hangar, it requires special equipment, it's loud and sounds like a really big R/C airplane. I've never heard one deployed while an airplane is airborne.I guess I just have no idea what the RAT sounds like.
How do you get it to turn in a hangar? As I recall the 757 RAT needed 130 knots for it make minimum hydraulic pressure.I've done the ops test on Bombardier Global RATs in the hangar, it requires special equipment, it's loud and sounds like a really big R/C airplane. I've never heard one deployed while an airplane is airborne.
Those are his first initials, the one who talks about flying in both the Air Force and the Navy. Pretty sure he wrote a book too. Huge channel, brings on other fighter guys, has a podcast, etc.
There's a whole contraption with a big cage and a big electric motor to turn the prop that you mount after you manually deploy the RAT. When you read the AMM regarding anything to do with the RAT you'd think the blades were fashioned from the dust under the nest of the goose that layed the golden egg, what I'm trying to say is they're expensive and fragile and precautions have to be taken to ensure they're not inadvertently damaged. There is an alternate procedure to do the test inflight, but because sometimes you've got half of the airplane disassembled and the clock keep sticking towards your deadline you do things in the hangar, I've been involved in restowing the contraption once the airplane lands but I've never heard it in the air.How do you get it to turn in a hangar? As I recall the 757 RAT needed 130 knots for it make minimum hydraulic pressure.
It must be pointed out the airplane did exactly what it was designed to do.That was like one time lol...
Is that "Mover?"CW had a particularly gross one as well, even for him. Impressively he will likely end up wrong on just about every point he makes. I commented asking what he plans to do when that happens, got auto-deleted in less than two minutes.
Are we talking about Chris from 20 years ago?I believe Cornholio got a cease/desist letter from a law firm representing the family of a crash victim that he recently did a video on.
Trying to recall who CW is…….
CW had a particularly gross one as well, even for him.
Trying to recall who CW is…….
Those are his first initials
Is that "Mover?"
I basically hit 'next' whenever the algorithm serves up Mover, qualified to comment or otherwise.Oh FFS just say who it is. Why the mystery
All the data recorders have been found. We will all know soon enough…
Are we talking about Chris from 20 years ago?
The 787 is nice how chatty and prolific it is for knowing a lot of things.The other night I went to a baseball game with my friend that’s a 787CA. In their words, Boeing already knows what took place without a FDR as the aircraft reports in real time to their airline’s maintenance department as well as the manufacturer. Apparently a much more advanced system than what MH370 had.
How do you get it to turn in a hangar? As I recall the 757 RAT needed 130 knots for it make minimum hydraulic pressure.
The 787 is nice how chatty and prolific it is for knowing a lot of things.
But from a practical perspective it probably didn’t tell much in the 30 seconds while it was airborne, and especially if it was experiencing power interruptions/system resets (unknown at this time).
Tho cropped, its visible from more than one angle. Quality is poor, yes. However, its gotta be either the RAT or a single gear door...but something is hanging down other than the gear...in the RAT area.The RAT speculation comes from the one video that is cropped and compressed to hell. At this point I believe it is a video artifact rather than the RAT.
I believe you pressurize the hydraulic system and it will back drive the RAT rather than the other way around as it would work in an emergencyHow do you get it to turn in a hangar? As I recall the 757 RAT needed 130 knots for it make minimum hydraulic pressure.
Hey! I resemble that remark. Truth be told most times I eat a light lunch because I don't like feeling sluggish in the afternoon. But there are times when a big lunch is appropriate and we try to do that sort of thing when things aren't busy. I've already introduced some here to the Greek goodness of Firehouse but I may have neglected Springbok. It's mostly a bar. Both are solid lunch or dinner spots if you find yourself at KVNY.The test is usually done after the engineers and mechanics eat a big Mexican lunch. Wind for days to test that thing out
Lol....at my INDOC at the AArline, a management type came in and specifically mentioned Steeeeeve (said it that way) and said, don't be himI think he’s already reversed course on his initial conclusion. Clown •.