BEEF SUPREME
Well-Known Member
It doesn’t IMO. Them again I’m not a person of size (wokeness got me). The only thing I miss about the Airbus is its comfortable flight deck. Other than that from a pure flying aspect, the 737 is more hands on and fun.
Cue the jokes, “hang the witch!”
Respectfully, it isn’t. The Falcon 900 that was a sweet flying airplane. The PC-12 that was a super fun airplane to fly. Even the X on the odd magical day when it wasn’t showing one of its many gremlins was mildly entertaining to fly.
The 737 is challenging sure. The 700s seem sort of balanced but after that it’s clear at least from a handling perspective that the design has far exceeded its limitations. What’s nice about approach speeds of over 160 knots? It’s hard on equipment and passengers. The controls are heavy. The gear is often used far outside of the FAF as a speed brake when flying into places like Palm Springs or Juneau.
After briefly flying the EMB175 the avionics and cockpit flows of the 737 feel much closer to WW2 than woke Seattle. It’s second nature now but I still catch myself wondering if the APU is really on the bus or not during taxi in. You’ve never dealt with it which is really clear, but I also wish the FAs could control the cabin temperature. At least FAs aren’t completely indifferent to the experience of the passengers.
I guess I’m rare in the airline world in that I actually care about what the passengers I’m flying are experiencing. It’s clear that even during negotiations our pilots would rather make the passengers sick from obscene cabin temperatures than spend a few pennies of their profit sharing check.
The 737 cabin is antiquated, hot and cramped. I do understand few pilots care but for me it’s a minus as well. After a recent experience I’d never voluntarily fly as a passenger on my own airline. I’m actually quite worried about my elderly parents who booked a summertime trip to JFK. I’m hopeful it’s on the Airbus with VX pilots.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk