Cessna in the Corn

fholbert

Mod's - Please don't edit my posts!
Strange one, looks like all thrust was lost.

avion-caido-otamendi.jpg



Owner/operator:Private
Registration: LV-FQD
C/n / msn: 560-5555
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 9
Other fatalities:0
Aircraft damage: Minor
Location:6 km from Otamendi (BsAs) -
LV.gif
Argentina
Phase:
Nature:Private
Departure airport:San Fernando airport
Destination airport:La Venancia
Narrative:
The private plane with 9 people on board made an emergency landing in a cornfield due to a probable engine failure, 6 km from Otamendi, shortly after arriving at its destination and in the middle of the storm.
No injuries declared.
 
Yup, they first lost one engine and 5 mins later the other one. Both ended up being stuck and couldn't be restarted in flight.
 
I wondered about that but isn't DEF an environmental additive? As nasty as the water was for the Olympics, it’s hard to believe Brazil has such regs.

It’s a requirement in recent Diesel engines.

The reservoir looks similar enough to FSII/Prist for the lowest IQ individuals to be able to mix them up when refilling.

I think the tally is 2 citations have landed without engines, one falcon that lost 2/3, a F-16 and some others. 7 airplanes in OMA and 5 in APF according to the FAA.



This ones good

 
It’s a requirement in recent Diesel engines.

The reservoir looks similar enough to FSII/Prist for the lowest IQ individuals to be able to mix them up when refilling.

I think the tally is 2 citations have landed without engines, one falcon that lost 2/3, a F-16 and some others. 7 airplanes in OMA and 5 in APF according to the FAA.



This ones good


Oh, I know the history here. We just missed the first mess with TACair in OMA. I went looking for that first SAIB — there were almost double that number were exposed. “Hey, what do you make of this NOTAM?” was going all around the office before we heard what was going on.

“F0013/17 NOTAMN Q) ZMP/QFUXX/IV/NBO/A/000/999/4118N09553W005 A) KOMA B) 1711211550 C) 1712212359 E) [DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ENERGY ADVISORY] CONTRACT FUEL NOT AVAILABLE TRUMAN ARNOLD COMPANIES DBA TAC AIR IS HEREBY NOTIFIED TO CEASE REFUELING ON ALL U.S. AIRCRAFT UNDER INTO-PLANE CONTRACT SPE600-16-D-0066 AT LOCATION KOMA – EPPLEY AIRFIELD AIRPORT, NEBRASKA. DUE TO SAFETY OF FLIGHT ISSUES REPORTED ON TWO AIR FORCE AIRCRAFT REFUELED AT THEIR FACILITY 18 NOV 2017 THAT RESULTED IN EMERGENCY LANDINGS. REFUELING OF U.S. GOVERNMENT AIRCRAFT IS IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDED AND SHALL REMAIN SO UNTIL THE DLA ENERGY CONTRACTING OFFICER NOTIFIES YOU OTHERWISE IN WRITING”

I was just wondering whether Brazil has the same stringent environmental regs like those i the US. If not, would they have DEF? Just like there are several vehicles you can’t in the US because of emissions.
 
Oh, I know the history here. We just missed the first mess with TACair in OMA. I went looking for that first SAIB — there were almost double that number were exposed. “Hey, what do you make of this NOTAM?” was going all around the office before we heard what was going on.

“F0013/17 NOTAMN Q) ZMP/QFUXX/IV/NBO/A/000/999/4118N09553W005 A) KOMA B) 1711211550 C) 1712212359 E) [DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ENERGY ADVISORY] CONTRACT FUEL NOT AVAILABLE TRUMAN ARNOLD COMPANIES DBA TAC AIR IS HEREBY NOTIFIED TO CEASE REFUELING ON ALL U.S. AIRCRAFT UNDER INTO-PLANE CONTRACT SPE600-16-D-0066 AT LOCATION KOMA – EPPLEY AIRFIELD AIRPORT, NEBRASKA. DUE TO SAFETY OF FLIGHT ISSUES REPORTED ON TWO AIR FORCE AIRCRAFT REFUELED AT THEIR FACILITY 18 NOV 2017 THAT RESULTED IN EMERGENCY LANDINGS. REFUELING OF U.S. GOVERNMENT AIRCRAFT IS IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDED AND SHALL REMAIN SO UNTIL THE DLA ENERGY CONTRACTING OFFICER NOTIFIES YOU OTHERWISE IN WRITING”

I was just wondering whether Brazil has the same stringent environmental regs like those i the US. If not, would they have DEF? Just like there are several vehicles you can’t in the US because of emissions.

Yes. They have and use DEF.
 
DEF is bad bad news. Crystallizes out of solution and blocks fuel filters. Just a little bit causes big problems.

That stuff should be banned within 50 miles of any airport.
 
Back
Top