Who else thinks NextGen was pushed by senior pilots who didn't feel like tpying flight plans anymore?

I do. The VOR to VOR system was fine and its easier to repair VORs then outer space satellites.

Sigh... I don't think you even know what nextgen is. Next time try to troll about something you actually understand. It's way more amusing for those of us who haven't already put you on ignore.
 
I do. The VOR to VOR system was fine and its easier to repair VORs then outer space satellites.
2798EE1B-D559-49B2-B670-FF29660B2FF3.gif
 
How long has it been since someone here actually shot a real NDB approach?
I just did a big logbook update, so I went and looked. December of 2011. With no GPS overlay. If you include NDB only but I had a 430 onboard and had the overlay and lets be honest I was actually flying that, then it was like 2015.
 
NexGen was pushed by those with an understanding that it’s trimming the edges and not addressing”the problem”, which is, of course, real estate.

You need 2 minutes, or there about, to land and clear. There’s no amount of ATC tweaks that are going to fix that. Many, if not all “congested” airports don’t have a lack of ATC, but a lack of concrete because they’ve reached the this physical limit. Adding more RNP approaches or RNAV arrivals with profile descents isn’t going to change that one bit.

Even when they try to tweak the system to be more efficient, the people who lie underneath start squawking about it, and the richer the people, the less likely it will change no matter what, so again, the problem isn’t with ATC, real estate.

Marginal improvement? Sure, but it’s a lot of squeeze for the juice you get.
 
Back
Top