The autopilot can already fly it without using the controls.
Why would it having a yoke matter?
Ok, you win. So I don't make any money until I get about four more people underneath me as associates, right?


The autopilot can already fly it without using the controls.
Why would it having a yoke matter?
At what cost?
Pilot-less cargo ops in 10.
FedEx paid over a million bucks a pop to convert their DC10s to remove the FE station.
HUDs don't provide a cost savings. Cutting the pilot ranks by 50% would save on the order of $2b a year in costs at the legacies. That is an annual savings, lifetime over the life of each plane roughly $18m to remove one pilot. Just rounding the numbers.
Why haven't we seen autonomous shipping vessels yet?
You will never see a single pilot MD-10/11.Our feeder airplane flight decks are more advanced than the the DC10 and 11s. We fly single pilot. I can easily see a exclusion for cargo in the near future for single pilot ops in a technically advanced upgraded MD-10/11.
If the ATRs weren't 121 they would already be flying single pilot. I'm pretty sure (70-30 or 80-20.) the Courier will be single pilot.
Cookie to the pilot who gets the hidden movie reference in there.....
Well you have a Microsoft device. If MS writes the code we're OK. If Apple does it we"re screwed. Not a single iPad issue over four years.
You will never see a single pilot MD-10/11.
Current regulations prohibit it. Just like our FAA prohibits it.Why haven't we seen autonomous shipping vessels yet?
Ironically I would bet FAs will still be required!Maybe not but I bet good money we see a "No" pilot MD-10/11 some day. Or some derivative of large capacity cargo airplane with no crew on board.
I'm not saying I am for it as a cargo pilot myself but I think the technology makes it inevitable.
I'm not trying to 'win', just bring awareness. Plus I think the technology neat.Ok, you win. So I don't make any money until I get about four more people underneath me as associates, right?When does my first check come and, in advance, you can't lease me a MBZ that I have to pay for out of sales. And my personal Facebook page will not be an extension of your marketing department!
![]()
Sure how much you willing to throw down? It's not going to happen on that fleet.Maybe not but I bet good money we see a "No" pilot MD-10/11 some day. Or some derivative of large capacity cargo airplane with no crew on board.
I'm not saying I am for it as a cargo pilot myself but I think the technology makes it inevitable.
Ironically I would bet FAs will still be required!
The #1/A/purser will probably be required to have some sort of ability to operate the aircraft manually just as a backup.
Sure how much you willing to throw down? It's not going to happen on that fleet.
You'd save a boatload more money developing a new engine than trying to cut <$500 per hour in wages. Just saying....Ok, thats probably true. The MDs are getting a bit long in the tooth.
I do know of a company that wants to retask a bunch of 727s for the same purpose though.
Why would the two be exclusive?You'd save a boatload more money developing a new engine than trying to cut <$500 per hour in wages. Just saying....
They don't have to be but if it's just to save money an engine is little easier. For starters an engine bolts on and the rest of the NAS is unaffected.Why would the two be exclusive?