...or just mow them.They needed to clean the gutters anyway.
Experimental helicopters are a big nope for me.
I realize that writing headlines is a pretty thankless task, but really, was there some possibility that the ntsb wouldn't investigate it when a helicopter crashed in to a house? Even one with wildly neglected gutters.
It's not necessarily the design that I'd be worried about.There are a couple of mature designs in the homebuilt helicopter world that I wouldn't balk at. Rotorway has been selling kits for over 40 years with several hundred flying examples, and the Safari is a clone of the Bell 47 which is certified.
The rotorway doesnt have the best safety reccord though.There are a couple of mature designs in the homebuilt helicopter world that I wouldn't balk at. Rotorway has been selling kits for over 40 years with several hundred flying examples, and the Safari is a clone of the Bell 47 which is certified.
Sling the moose.The rotorway doesnt have the best safety reccord though.
I think a safari would be cool. Almost pulled the trigger on a kit up here a guy bought but never touched.
Helicopters being the ultimate STOL machine.
Can't use them even for transport in hunting though so that renders them almost useless to me.
It's illegal.Why not?
Sling the moose.
The Rotorways have a belt that runs the length of the tailboom and drives the tailrotor. I think there’s a lot to replace it with a shaft, but I’m not certain. The problem a friend had with his (and resulted in 2 crashes) was that the belt rolled in the pulley.
As for other designs: Helicycle for the win!