I don't know what I like more. The "hirer" or the fact that it's a DWI (not a DUI). Or the fact that the recruiters actually answered the question and want to interview him.

It's like the way Kiera Knightly pronounces "fire" in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies! Almost ruins it entirely, except for would PLOW!I don't know what I like more. The "hirer" or the fact that it's a DWI (not a DUI). Or the fact that the recruiters actually answered the question and want to interview him.

It's like the way Kiera Knightly pronounces "fire" in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies! Almost ruins it entirely, except for would PLOW!
or the fact that it's a DWI (not a DUI).
FWIW, back in the 80s, that was the correct term (Driving While Intoxicated).
I don't know what I like more. The "hirer" or the fact that it's a DWI (not a DUI). Or the fact that the recruiters actually answered the question and want to interview him.
I had someone with a DUI in my new hire class. That person should go on to have an excellent career.
I'm just gonna go ahead and leave this right here..............................

Trust me, it's not that much different up the food chain.
A couple things I would suggest before anyone gets any bright ideas about trolling:
a. It's a small world. HINT HINT. Everyone talks.
b. Your public information is aggregated into an 'about' page when you interact with a page.
c. Anonymity on Facebook, no matter how clever you think you are, is a laughable fantasy.

I wouldn't troll any of them or that page. It was just funny, that was all

Hilarious for the person right up until the point the administrator of the page contacts their colleague "higher up the food chain" and says, "get a load of this"
Flag.
What was the airline, was at an American newhire pilot class in 2001 that was told, "You're at American now. You can afford to burn a bridge."
6 months later they were all furloughed.
Or maybe it's just a legend story. But I have heard it.
The assumption there being it was a "long" time ago and this guy hasn't had any incident since. Still, it just goes to show the applicant pool of the highest caliber have been taken from 2014-2016 and now they are more willing to consider those with potential issues. As someone who doesn't drink, I can't really have respect for anyone who would drive under the influence and put innocent people and their families at risk. Far too many drunk driving deaths nationwide.
And without giving out any names, lets just say an airline I know of had two recent firings for alcohol-related instances of pilots. This problem exists even today, which is why I would be hesitant to hire those with DUI/DWI charges. But then again, I don't set the tier standards. So more power to anyone who can play the game and get hired successfully.
