Xcaliber
El Chupacabra
If we as a country followed that logic, then only 11-12% of families would be able to have kids (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/leave_report_final.pdf). Of those jobs that have formal paid family leave policies, how many do you think are held by women in their child bearing years? This is a total guess, but I'd say 20% at best. So that would mean that only 2% of jobs in this country would allow the type of family planning you're talking about. And let's dig in into other socialeconomic issues...how many of those are held by non-white women? How many of those jobs added those policies in just the last 5-10 years?Whoa, lets back up a second. I said that there should be paid maternity at F9, and I also said they should make accommodations for mothers to pump their breast milk. And I'm all for people trying to change that. But my point was that if your employer isn't terribly accommodating to new mothers, or you can't afford to go out on unpaid leave, or you can't change jobs, perhaps right now isn't the best time to have a kid. Last time I checked, getting pregnant was something that people can control.
I'm not saying that your argument isn't valid, it's just woefully inadequate and is only a minor piece of the puzzle. If we followed your logic, extremely few people would be able to have families. If you thought Japan's elderly population was a problem...