SFCC/UND
Well-Known Member
APU to 10k is that SOP at your place? Interesting.
Normal sop is apu bleed on, packs on, and engine bleeds off.
Only time we do bleed on packs off is during inop apu and icing takeoff.
APU to 10k is that SOP at your place? Interesting.
At XJT we swapped the bleeds @ 1000ft and killed the APU. Going to 10k seems like a waste. In the end it is what the management "geniuses" want I guess.Normal sop is apu bleed on, packs on, and engine bleeds off.
Only time we do bleed on packs off is during inop apu and icing takeoff.
I have a difficult time believing this.
people living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.....Good grief.
Aware.people living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.....
For the company: They write the check and own the airplanes. There toys, there rules.
That isn't the point. We all know that the CA holds the responsibility, however you are bringing up cases that would stray from the norm. If a CA is consistently doing 2 engine taxi and longer APU run times there will be a trend to be observed. If you fly the plane like you're supposed to those little operational hiccups aren't going to negatively affect your average fuel burn relative to the company standard.It may be "THEIR" toys and "THEIR" rules. But remember it's the captain responsibility. Cold winter day yields longer warm up times. Snow on the ground may require two engine to taxi.
It may be "THEIR" toys and "THEIR" rules. But remember it's the captain responsibility. Cold winter day yields longer warm up times. Snow on the ground may require two engine to taxi.
I'm an FO but if it were up to me when circumstances allowed I would SE taxi and follow APU compliance whenever possible for 2 simple reasons.
fapfapfapfapfapIn 1982, during the winter, a buddy of mine was paid by Allegeny to sit in a plane all night and babysit the APU so the plane would be nice and warm in the morning.
Thank god for that alert chime.In 1982, during the winter, a buddy of mine was paid by Allegeny to sit in a plane all night and babysit the APU so the plane would be nice and warm in the morning.
This is ok and all I reckon, but part of me can't help but think about the potential safety impact or impact on pax comfort level. We all know there are those captains out there who will be stuck waiting for a gate in the middle of the summer but won't fire up the APU because of fuel savings. This sort of informal pressure might cause some types to cut corners or make pax uncomfortable is my concern.
I believe the great majority of us operate with safety first, followed closely by crew/pax comfort, schedule and company needs in that order. I know I wouldn't let external pressures like this dictate how we manage the flight up front, but I could see some folks taking it a bit too literally.
Data is good, but applied the wrong way it could lead to unexpected consequences.
Meanwhile...If it's uncomfortable and you're not starting the APU because of fuel conservation at my shop, you're not adhering to corporate policy.
If it's uncomfortable and you're not starting the APU because of fuel conservation at my shop, you're not adhering to corporate policy.
Meanwhile...
nah, his all say younitedFunny thing is that it says Delta on the side of your plane too...