Calvin and Hobbs Meter
Well-Known Member
Flying for the airlines is the career path I have always planned on pursuing.
First off, I am tied down to living in a non-domicile city for 3 more years, no if ands or buts (family constraints). Although the pay isn't great, I enjoy the job I have now, flying pt 135 for a moderately small company. Currently I am flying +/- 450 hours a year, 1/3 PIC & 2/3 SIC jet, until next year where it will be 50/50 pic/sic. I get a pretty descent amount of vacation, and I am never bothered or questioned while doing the duties of my job.
If you were me, would you rather join a regional airline now, and commute for 3 years (until you could move to a domicile), thus, getting a jump on your seniority...
...or would you choose to continue flying pt. 135, saving yourself the pain of 121 commuting for 3 years, and then joining 121 when you could move.
In your opinion, which option lends it's-self towards the best balance between career advancement and QOL? Personally, I care very much about my QOL (e.g. staying happy).
First off, I am tied down to living in a non-domicile city for 3 more years, no if ands or buts (family constraints). Although the pay isn't great, I enjoy the job I have now, flying pt 135 for a moderately small company. Currently I am flying +/- 450 hours a year, 1/3 PIC & 2/3 SIC jet, until next year where it will be 50/50 pic/sic. I get a pretty descent amount of vacation, and I am never bothered or questioned while doing the duties of my job.
If you were me, would you rather join a regional airline now, and commute for 3 years (until you could move to a domicile), thus, getting a jump on your seniority...
...or would you choose to continue flying pt. 135, saving yourself the pain of 121 commuting for 3 years, and then joining 121 when you could move.
In your opinion, which option lends it's-self towards the best balance between career advancement and QOL? Personally, I care very much about my QOL (e.g. staying happy).