While I would never ever condone using automotive parts on an aircraft, it is a fact that if you order an alternator belt from Piper, they send you a Gates Green Stripe belt with a Piper sticker slapped on the cardboard sleeve and a Piper part number hand-written on the belt in paint marker. It is also a fact that these belts work much better and last much longer than the custom-made ones you can buy from Lycoming.There used to be a place out of Schaumburg Airport (06C) that put automotive belts, car alternators from Pep Boys, and all sorts of non-FAA approved crap on their planes. I'm surprised nobody got injured. Then again, I see why they're no longer in business...
While I would never ever condone using automotive parts on an aircraft, it is a fact that if you order an alternator belt from Piper, they send you a Gates Green Stripe belt with a Piper sticker slapped on the cardboard sleeve and a Piper part number hand-written on the belt in paint marker. It is also a fact that these belts work much better and last much longer than the custom-made ones you can buy from Lycoming.
Although the one that far and away takes the cake is the manifold pressure gauge line filters in the Piper Chieftain...they are tampons. I kid you not.
New or used? LOL!While I would never ever condone using automotive parts on an aircraft, it is a fact that if you order an alternator belt from Piper, they send you a Gates Green Stripe belt with a Piper sticker slapped on the cardboard sleeve and a Piper part number hand-written on the belt in paint marker. It is also a fact that these belts work much better and last much longer than the custom-made ones you can buy from Lycoming.
Although the one that far and away takes the cake is the manifold pressure gauge line filters in the Piper Chieftain...they are tampons. I kid you not.
I hate to say it but this is fairly standard of all the 152s I've ever flown, and has more to do with operator error then any mechanical problem. If the CFIs don't teach their students to always taxi with the mixture leaned out... and I mean really leaned out, not a turn or two... this will inevitably happen regardless of how often the spark plugs are sandblasted.
The Seneca is basically a twin Cherokee 6 (well, Lance) and is therefore awesome.+1 on this. The 152 plugs are always fouling up. I'd even lean the mixture below 3000ft. Spend an hour at 1000ft with the mixture rich, and you'll need to clean them again.
Not sure why so many people here don't like the Duchess either. It beats the Seminole and the Seneca in just about every category for me. The only thing the Seneca has over a Duchess is that on longer flights, it has way more room.
I worked for LAI. I remember seeing AA on the road a few times, and I would have gladly traded for a crappy looking airplane. My airplane had pretty fresh paint on it, so it looked nice. Too bad it spent many hours showing off that paint job while sitting in various MX shops around the country. Had they invested in a better engine/avionics instead of paint my season would have been MUCH better. After the 2nd engine issue they finally replaced the whole engine, and in the closing weeks of the season they put a new radio in.
I honestly thought it was going to be simply time building for 7 months. It was so much more than that. There were 3 honest to god moments during that season that for the first time in my flying career, I thought I was going to be landing off airport. And the engine eating valves weren't those times.
Here's my experience with the Duchess
![]()
Amazing that I still didn't pick that for biggest POS flown lol
Good grief. How many different airplanes is that made out of? Any matching serial numbers on that?I have to trot out this old Chestnut for this thread:
![]()
However, be aprised that Patches was light years LESS of a POS than ANY Be99 I've ever even seen, let alone flown. She was just a little aesthetically challenged.
I'll take the blame for 8888. That was the first one I flew at 9E, and it had just been delivered. I remember it had a couple electrical bugs on it then... I guess they never worked themselves out, but that plane definitely has a special place in my heart being the first jet I ever landed.![]()
I have to trot out this old Chestnut for this thread:
![]()
However, be aprised that Patches was light years LESS of a POS than ANY Be99 I've ever even seen, let alone flown. She was just a little aesthetically challenged.
Does the Premier fly as bad as it looks? Looks like a pregnant duck.I'd say it's a toss up between the T-6A, Beech Premier, and the really crappy 182 jump plane I flew once upon a time.
Looks like the tail number is duct taped on.![]()
I was waiting for "patches" to make an appearance. That's not the first time Boris has dropped that pic on this forum. The Pilatus must be pretty boring compared to that thing.![]()