Go Jets Questions

Yeah Skywest always has a line at the door, the people working there love it and even talking to them face to face you'll say to yourself, "God the koolaid is thick over there!" They are doing something right, and they have their pick of pilots. Our furloughs that went over there are very happy and that's a fairly good metric.

I was on a sky west flight recently and the flight attendant was talking to an expressjet pilot sitting in the first row. The pilot mentioned how he applied to Skywest back in the day but didn't have enough hours. The flight attendant was encouraging him to apply because he'd surely be qualified now! Like leaving Xjet after 2 years to go back to 1st year pay at Skywest would be super awesome.

As an aside, telling someone that you won't ever give them a letter of rec (when they didn't even ask) because you don't agree with them is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen on this forum. High horse much?
 
As an aside, telling someone that you won't ever give them a letter of rec (when they didn't even ask) because you don't agree with them is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen on this forum. High horse much?

Well keep in mind he wouldn't give me a letter of rec because he feels I attacked him. I did say pay for a job instead of pay for training, and that's my mistake (although I remember in '03 at the Riddle career fair saying "Wait so I have to pay them for a job?"). Although I'm still struggling to see a difference but I never did a lot of research into the topic. I had a chance to get paid to work as a dispatcher or try and slug it out trying to fly airplanes after graduation in '03 (and no job prospects unless I could pay someone for a job), I took the road that was best for me.

Honestly I wonder how that recommendation goes anyhow. "I know this guy from online, he's cool with me, kthxbai". I wouldn't be comfortable getting a recommendation letter from my friends at other airlines unless I've flown with them. However that is a comfort level on my part, I would rather that recommendation letter to read, "Yo chief, I flew with this guy he's what we need in this company and he buys a round on the overnight, hire him foo'!" than an eloquent pager describing my many posts on JC. Not that there is anything wrong with JC, just seems like an unconvincing recommendation that this pilot would fit in.

Also, how does that CP phone call go? "Hey I know this guy from online, I liked him (or something) until we disagreed on something, also I didn't like his internet tone when he talked about my past." I don't know, but it's not the first time ATN has talked about not wanting guys from this web board at his company (before SWA) because of things they say online. My imagination would be that the phone call would go in a little bit of a slant never admitting he'd never met me and only knows my name because of other people from the web board telling him. *shrug* One way or another, that's who our member Todd is.
 
Well keep in mind he wouldn't give me a letter of rec because he feels I attacked him. I did say pay for a job instead of pay for training, and that's my mistake (although I remember in '03 at the Riddle career fair saying "Wait so I have to pay them for a job?"). Although I'm still struggling to see a difference but I never did a lot of research into the topic. I had a chance to get paid to work as a dispatcher or try and slug it out trying to fly airplanes after graduation in '03 (and no job prospects unless I could pay someone for a job), I took the road that was best for me.

Honestly I wonder how that recommendation goes anyhow. "I know this guy from online, he's cool with me, kthxbai". I wouldn't be comfortable getting a recommendation letter from my friends at other airlines unless I've flown with them. However that is a comfort level on my part, I would rather that recommendation letter to read, "Yo chief, I flew with this guy he's what we need in this company and he buys a round on the overnight, hire him foo'!" than an eloquent pager describing my many posts on JC. Not that there is anything wrong with JC, just seems like an unconvincing recommendation that this pilot would fit in.

Also, how does that CP phone call go? "Hey I know this guy from online, I liked him (or something) until we disagreed on something, also I didn't like his internet tone when he talked about my past." I don't know, but it's not the first time ATN has talked about not wanting guys from this web board at his company (before SWA) because of things they say online. My imagination would be that the phone call would go in a little bit of a slant never admitting he'd never met me and only knows my name because of other people from the web board telling him. *shrug* One way or another, that's who our member Todd is.

Yeah, I won't give a rec unless I've met somebody in person and feel they are good people. I think that's a much more important quality than saying "I've flown with them and they're a good pilot." You can teach people to fly a plane. But its hard to teach them not to be an ass.

But yeah, I would imagine the "Mr. Chief Pilot, so and so hurt my feelings on the intereweb!" phone call would be pretty amusing. This is a small industry, I have flown with people who know some of our more "interesting" members on here. Conversation usually goes something like "do you know ______?" "*chuckles* oh....hah...that guy. Yeah..."
 
Yeah, I won't give a rec unless I've met somebody in person and feel they are good people. I think that's a much more important quality than saying "I've flown with them and they're a good pilot." You can teach people to fly a plane. But its hard to teach them not to be an ass.

But yeah, I would imagine the "Mr. Chief Pilot, so and so hurt my feelings on the intereweb!" phone call would be pretty amusing. This is a small industry, I have flown with people who know some of our more "interesting" members on here. Conversation usually goes something like "do you know ______?" "*chuckles* oh....hah...that guy. Yeah..."
Or how about this for a thought, and keep in mind this was a 20 year guy here who changed careers from a corporate sales job in Minnenoplace. "Just because you like the guy doesn't mean he'll fit into the airline you work for. Culture is important, think about that sort of stuff when you recommend a guy."
 
Or how about this for a thought, and keep in mind this was a 20 year guy here who changed careers from a corporate sales job in Minnenoplace. "Just because you like the guy doesn't mean he'll fit into the airline you work for. Culture is important, think about that sort of stuff when you recommend a guy."

Also a valid point.
 
Funny how mentioning Gojet end's up in fireworks so often. This one reminded me of APC.

I liked the Gulfstream threads more, though, as I felt PFJ was more of an attack on the profession. Management will always be trying to dick you with an alter ego/B scale/outsourcing. Get used to it. But the last thing we needed was pilots trying to dick the profession by paying their way into a 121 cockpit. It always humored me when Gulfstreamer's defended themselves by saying they didn't pay for the the job, just the training necessary to be offered the job. Okay, fine... The Gulfstream scheme was set up to find pilots willing to be a revenue source for the airline. You can debate the details, but this was not a good thing for the profession and, thankfully, it's a done deal now.

I only rehash this as I think we should never forget. Just like we should never forget what a scab is and not water down the definition. Streamers aren't scabs, and I'm not suggesting they are, but the route those guys took was BAD for the profession and it's GOOD that PFJ is gone.
 
ibtl00183f.jpg
 
I agree with ATN 100%. Pilots like to fight battles that are already lost rather than look long to the future. By directing hate at Gojet a regional pilot a directing hate at themselves. Im sure the mainline pilot was willing to fly the RJs for a certain rate that management refused. Now most of us sit in mainline seats for reduced wages. Deny yourself the jumpseat next time....

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
 
Gosh I love aviation. So E/P/others are cutting like crazy. Great Lakes pays poverty wages. Republic is a mess. Fly for GoJet and I might find the only airline ejection seat. Work for scummy 135 companies and risk my certificate. So what you're saying is the only airline that I might be able to work for and pay bills at the same time without finding a knife in my back is skywest?

Skywest/ASA/XJT would be a good career move.
 
I agree with ATN 100%. Pilots like to fight battles that are already lost rather than look long to the future. By directing hate at Gojet a regional pilot a directing hate at themselves. Im sure the mainline pilot was willing to fly the RJs for a certain rate that management refused. Now most of us sit in mainline seats for reduced wages. Deny yourself the jumpseat next time....

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

Advising someone to work somewhere else is hardly "directing hate."
 
I agree with ATN 100%. Pilots like to fight battles that are already lost rather than look long to the future. By directing hate at Gojet a regional pilot a directing hate at themselves. Im sure the mainline pilot was willing to fly the RJs for a certain rate that management refused. Now most of us sit in mainline seats for reduced wages. Deny yourself the jumpseat next time....

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

This can't be said enough. All this drama in the regional world is non-sense. ALL of you are flying lines that used to be covered by pilots that were substantially better compensated.

With GoJet. The union played chicken with TSA and lost. That's it.
 
Really? Your join date is 2007, so I figured you were around for all of those threads where Velo and I spoke of the evils of non-union carriers. I would never work for a non-union carrier. While you're worried about GoJet, a carrier that employs furloughed UAL union brothers, carriers like Virgin America are out there actually doing real harm to our profession. I wonder how eager SWA will be to give me a pay raise while a Virgin FO tops out at year 12 at less than a second year FO at SWA? GoJet does no harm to my career, and they help my furloughed union brothers from UAL. Virgin America poses a real threat to my career. That's what I care about. You're still fighting yesterday's fight.

Tell us how you really feel! First, you're an original Airtran pilot, NOT a SWA pilot. When you accepted employment at Airtran in early 2007, that was before their new TA, and your payrates were far lower than Virgin's. Where was your speech back then? You had no problem accepting employment for a carrier that paid far below its competitors.

As for your FO rate top out comment, it's an apples to oranges comparison. We don't have 12 year FOs. The most junior Captain was hired Feb 2009, and going more junior. Southwest is looking at 12-15, maybe even 20 year (or more) upgrade times. Your FOs have it good, and I hope they enjoy and profit as much as they can while it still lasts. Besides, Virgin's payrates are only victims of post-9/11/recession concessionary contracts from legacies. 12 year FO rate at Virgin is 95/hr and United's bus driver is $94/hr and US Air is $85/hr. I would love to see higher rates, and with time (and profits), that can be attainable. But our colleagues have to recover from their concessionary contracts and lead the way. Virgin has received several pay increases, and should continue to do so as time goes on.

And besides, all this is a moot point. Your own SWA CEO already threatened your group with his letter that now AA is in bankruptcy, SWA is the last legacy left with the highest labor costs. With the fuel heges running out, SWA will soon face the reality that all other legacies have faced. Productivity can only do so much. And if SWA isn't willing to give you a raise as a 12 year FO, it's because they are making $151/hr making over $175,000 as a FO, a wage that that at other airlines is attainable only as a legacy Captain. Let alone Virgin America........... what are you gonna use as leverage to demand more pay at Southwest? It's kinda hard when there's no one in front of you and everyone else is behind you by miles. I do wish you the best, but the smug attitude of some SWA gets old pretty quick. Before 9/11, SWA was the drag of the industry and every single legacy 737 pilot loathed SWA and their payrates. How times change!
 
Besides, I'm worried you gonna stroke out the day you're no longer an ALPA pilot. Hopefully SWAPA will take you with open arms. How's your history with the AAI group? Were you recalled for something? Are you interested in running for a SWAPA position?
 
First, you're an original Airtran pilot, NOT a SWA pilot.

Thank you for pointing that out! I'm quite proud of that fact. :)

When you accepted employment at Airtran in early 2007, that was before their new TA, and your payrates were far lower than Virgin's.

Wrong. Our captains topped out at $154/hr compared to $150/hr for a topped out Virgin captain. And that was under a contract signed well over a decade ago. Our FO rates were lower, but again, that was a contract signed in 2000. You can't compare your rates to a contract signed 12 years ago. You have to compare your rates to contracts right now.

Where was your speech back then? You had no problem accepting employment for a carrier that paid far below its competitors.

AirTran was a union carrier engaged in Section 6 negotiations, actively fighting for much improved wages (which we achieved). In addition, even under that old contract, our CA rates exceeded the industry standard at the time, and the FO rates were about industry standard.

If you were looking at joining a union to improve your wages, then I would have no complaint with Virgin. After JetBlue started the union push, my beef with them ended. Same with Allegiant. So far, there are no indications that there is an active union push going on at Virgin. When that happens, my attitude towards Virgin will change.

As for your FO rate top out comment, it's an apples to oranges comparison. We don't have 12 year FOs. The most junior Captain was hired Feb 2009, and going more junior.

Fine, let's look the rates that your pilots are actually getting, compared to industry-standard rates:

2yr FO
Virgin - $65
JBU - $69
ATN - $70
ALA - $75
DAL - $86
SWA - $97

4yr CA
Virgin - $123
ATN - $131
JBU - $143
ALA - $157
DAL - $162
SWA - $198

You're closest to us at AirTran, but still trail by a good margin. And the only reason you're even remotely close to us is that we didn't target any money towards those years in contract negotiations, since we didn't have hardly any pilots at that longevity. Our money was targeted towards 4+ year FOs and 8+ year captains. Still, you lag even our rates that were barely adjusted from a 12 year old contract in those longevity years. That says something.

Besides, Virgin's payrates are only victims of post-9/11/recession concessionary contracts from legacies. 12 year FO rate at Virgin is 95/hr and United's bus driver is $94/hr and US Air is $85/hr. I would love to see higher rates, and with time (and profits), that can be attainable. But our colleagues have to recover from their concessionary contracts and lead the way. Virgin has received several pay increases, and should continue to do so as time goes on.

An outrageous argument. In reality, the opposite is true. The legacies only took those draconian concessions because non-union pay rates were used as the argument to the bankruptcy courts of why management needed the concessions from the legacy pilots. Managements at carriers like USAirways and United pointed directly to the JetBlue rates, which at the time, were similar to your current rates. What you conveniently fail to point out is that Virgin just got new pay rates in February, and those increases failed to keep up with the new bargaining cycle, which is indicated by the ATN, ALA, and HAL contracts, with DAL and UAL soon to follow.

And besides, all this is a moot point. Your own SWA CEO already threatened your group with his letter that now AA is in bankruptcy, SWA is the last legacy left with the highest labor costs.

The only thing our CEO mentioned in his letter was productivity improvements. Specifically, he's concerned about unplanned absences (e.g., excessive sick leave use, abnormally high OJI claims, etc.). There have been absolutely no "threats" about pay.
 
Back
Top