LOT 767 Rumot.....

Sorry Doug. I was speaking of WAW. We stay at a nice Marriot with a Champs. EWR? I'm happy to say I can't remember last time I stayed there. Maybe never did. Hope I never do.

As to the center hydraulic system failure in a 76. I read our checklist and it doesn't say land at nearest suitable. I remember back in the day it used to say with only one hydraulic system remaining, you are forced to land at nearest suitable. Now it doesn't even say that anymore. But it does say this:

There are some situations which always require landing at the nearest suitable airport. These situations include, but are not limited to, conditions where:
.The non-normal checklist contains the words “Plan to land at the nearest suitable airport.”
.Cabin smoke or fire which persists.
.One main AC power source remaining (such as engine or APU generator).
.Any other situation determined by the crew to present a significant adverse effect on safety if the flight is continued.

I like that last one....

A loss of any hydraulic system on a Boeing is a fairly rare event. You probably won't know what caused it. Is something else wrong? There are two power systems for Left and Right and the Center has three. The center system on a 76 is the most important of the three systems. It's one thing to press on if you lose a system going from SDF to ATL when it's day VFR. It's another to press on during a crossing. But I don't think I'd have faced a carpet dance had I turned around and came back.

I gotta add this as I mull it over in my head:

The 75/76 is a great airplane. Been on it over 10 years and the worst I've seen is flap asymmetry on landing and it was no big deal. The flipside is going to the sim once a year and all hell breaks loose. Each sim is a preplanned disaster. Sometimes you are in the sim and you run the checklist and you just play the game that you are supposed to land. That's what they want you to do in the sim. Takeoff, crap happens, then turn around and land. There have been times in the sim where I've just kinda played along and made the decision to land cause I think that's what they want. I think in real life you have to look at a lot of factors and do what you think is best. I don't blame the LOT crew for pressing on. The checklist doesn't say land. It just says turn the system off. Not sure if they felt pressured to continue for whatever reason but you start getting into a gray area of personal opinion of whats safe or not and that's what the PIC job is all about.

Never worry about the carpet dance when you make a call. You are doing what you think is safe and prudent at any given moment and, when it really boils down to it, that's what they pay you for.
 

Attachments

  • fly.jpg
    fly.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 48
I love my 767 (and have come to prefer it over flying the 757), but it's got some really quirky stuff as far as systems go. The most important system, the center system, is powered by two electric pumps, and backed up by an air pump (yes, you heard me right). Like Doug said, you can't get the gear down, period, if you're out of electrical power. If the air pump is busticated, you take a 40,000 lb hit in limit max takeoff weight. The breaker for the alternate gear extension motor is conveniently located (and hidden away) behind the F/O seat.

The 757 on the other hand, was not designed by monkeys with drafting tables. Heavy lifting is done by a big ol' engine pump, and if you're having a really bad day and lose all electrics, the gear still comes down. No air pumps.
 
I love my 767 (and have come to prefer it over flying the 757), but it's got some really quirky stuff as far as systems go. The most important system, the center system, is powered by two electric pumps, and backed up by an air pump (yes, you heard me right). Like Doug said, you can't get the gear down, period, if you're out of electrical power. If the air pump is busticated, you take a 40,000 lb hit in limit max takeoff weight. The breaker for the alternate gear extension motor is conveniently located (and hidden away) behind the F/O seat.

The 757 on the other hand, was not designed by monkeys with drafting tables. Heavy lifting is done by a big ol' engine pump, and if you're having a really bad day and lose all electrics, the gear still comes down. No air pumps.

There's a reason for this. As was explained in initial GS, the 757 was designed by the engineers who designed the 727. The guys who took their work and modified it for the 767 where the same monkeys who designed the 747.
 
Back
Top