United 93 - Accident Investigation

SeanD said:
Maybe Ill waterboard the old bird over the holidays to see what else I can get out of her.
Click to expand...

No!! . Please don't do that. . The way you described her, she sounds like a Patriot. . A real one. . The kind I like.. Give her a hug for us and thank her for her service. . I like CIA people. . They're soldiers. . Its their civilian leadership I sometimes question. .

Qutch
 
SeanD said:
Well "bro". Its safe to assume you have likely networked your way out of any career opportunities within the aviation industry as far as this website goes. Aviation is a small, small world.
Click to expand...

If you say so "dude", however I don't think any potential employers would discriminate against somebody on here because they openly admit not wanting to meet friends off the internet.
 
Qutch said:
.First, I think that ATN_Pilot made a good point . . No one knows who anyone is here. .
Click to expand...

JC is very different from a lot of web sites in the fact that most members do know each other. That is how JC works. We network online and in real life.
 
Jet said:
Don't worry bro, I don't judge or look down on those who meet all their guy friends online. I guess times have changed, I remember not all that long ago it was socially frowned upon to meet a girl online but that has changed. I guess now we are at the level where it is okay for a man to meet some kick ass men online for a mutually satisfying purpose.
Click to expand...
So do you want a shovel or you wanna just keep digging with your hands? Good thing what you lack in networking you make up in reading people off of an internet forum. If it wasn't for jetcareers, I wouldn't have any friends. It is true, this website was started as a place for pilots to spark bromances. Which raises the question, why did you come to such a forum if you don't want in on the manwhich?
 
I just don't get how people have developed such a pretentious and flawed understanding of fundamental Physics and sciences and the disrespect and disregard of the BEST research, development and tech industry in the world is beyond my comprehension.

Anyway watch and learn

madrid_skyscraper.jpg911_-_windsor_tower_1_small.pngFire1.giffire2.giffire3.giffire4 13--oct182004.jpginterstate_bank.jpginterstate3.jpgmadrid_burning.jpg799px-CCTV_new_headquarters_Fire_20090209.jpg
 
Seriously it's not worth the hate and the constant bickering, just stick to the original post

continued pictures.......

mandarin_oriental_1.jpgmandarin_oriental_2.jpg

And then we have the disappearance of WTC7
pp190104building7.jpg
 
Who is Marvin P. Bush? Why was thermite residue found in the ashes? I also like the way the passport was "found" on the street. hmmmmm.
 
Aurora777 said:
Seriously it's not worth the hate and the constant bickering, just stick to the original post

continued pictures.......

View attachment 18233View attachment 18234

And then we have the disappearance of WTC7
View attachment 18235
Click to expand...

Two things:

1) That image of WTC7 is before the 2 tallest buildings in the world collapsed on top of it
2) The other pictures of burning skyscrapers have one considerable difference to the WTC. They didn't have a twin-engine transport category aircraft impact them at cruise speeds.
 
FAYEV said:
Two things:

1) That image of WTC7 is before the 2 tallest buildings in the world collapsed on top of it
> You are kidding me right? Either you are just playing dumb or you are trying real hard....
2) The other pictures of burning skyscrapers have one considerable difference to the WTC. They didn't have a twin-engine transport category aircraft impact them at cruise speeds.
Click to expand...
>So what plane went in to WT7??????

If you don't mind me asking, how old are you? No disrespect or anything but It would help me understand your comments a lot better if you were still in high school...
 
FAYEV said:
Two things:

1) That image of WTC7 is before the 2 tallest buildings in the world collapsed on top of it
2) The other pictures of burning skyscrapers have one considerable difference to the WTC. They didn't have a twin-engine transport category aircraft impact them at cruise speeds.
Click to expand...

Respectfully, the twin towers collapsed on top of WTC 7?? The twin towers collapsed in on themselves, not on top of the WTC 7. I guess if anything, they damaged the base? Any structural engineers, architects wanna logically explain this?
 
Aurora777 said:
>So what plane went in to WT7??????

If you don't mind me asking, how old are you? No disrespect or anything but It would help me understand your comments a lot better if you were still in high school...
Click to expand...

You are correct, the twin towers did not necessarily collapse on top of it, but they did not fall straight down and land exactly within the footprint of the foundation either. As I mentioned earlier and as can be seen in the photo I posted earlier, the building suffered significant damage when debris collapsed into the building.

I was referring to the twin towers when you posted those pictures of burning skyscrapers, as that was the argument I thought you were making.

The fact that you are questioning my age proves that you have nothing to back up your argument with other than insults. Again, I recommend reading the official report that I posted earlier. The one that has input from structural engineers and scientists, people with far more experience and qualifications than ourselves. While we're at it, I bet the I-35W Minneapolis bridge collapse was a conspiracy as well. Why not? It's been explained by structural engineers, but why should we believe them? ...Your arguments defy logic. Everything has been explained scientifically, but of course all of you conspiracy folks choose to ignore those reports to meet your own agenda.
 
hambone said:
Respectfully, the twin towers collapsed on top of WTC 7?? The twin towers collapsed in on themselves, not on top of the WTC 7. I guess if anything, they damaged the base? Any structural engineers, architects wanna logically explain this?
Click to expand...

You do know most of the south side of WTC 7 was gone just a big hole? Also keep in mind that WTC 7 didn't show and of the sights or sounds of a controlled demolition.
 
[video=youtube_share;hZEvA8BCoBw]http://youtu.be/hZEvA8BCoBw[/video]

This video includes the opinion of over 1,300 Architects & Engineers about building 7.
 
Troy said:
This video includes the opinion of over 1,300 Architects & Engineers about building 7.
Click to expand...

Did you see Richard Gage's video "Blueprint for Truth" I think it is a good video and ask a lot of good questions and and points but I also think people should watch Chris Mohr's video "Blueprint for Truth Rebuttal (Not Debunked)" both are good videos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top