Sporty's E6B vs. ASA CX-2 Flight Computer

Just because you didn't learn how to competently use a manual E6B doesn't mean it is anachronic. I dominate with my manual E6B.

Sorry, I'm not using one anymore as the plane I fly has all the automation needed, and if feel the curiosity, I'll just use the iPhone E6B. I maintain it is totally anachronic. Telex was great, before emails came along...
 
Sorry, I'm not using one anymore as the plane I fly has all the automation needed, and if feel the curiosity, I'll just use the iPhone E6B. I maintain it is totally anachronic. Telex was great, before emails came along...
Anachronistic? In an airbus, yes. In a TriPacer, not so much.
 
Sorry, I'm not using one anymore as the plane I fly has all the automation needed, and if feel the curiosity, I'll just use the iPhone E6B. I maintain it is totally anachronic. Telex was great, before emails came along...
Yes, Pepe... I don't expect an Airbus driver to be using an E6B, lol. I think once people get into turbine equipment they no longer have a need for an E6B.
 
Anachronistic? In an airbus, yes. In a TriPacer, not so much.

Theres no reason that you can use modern technology flying a TriPacer. I swear people try to purposely date themselves by using ancient tools just because they fly an older airplane.
 
Theres no reason that you can use modern technology flying a TriPacer. I swear people try to purposely date themselves by using ancient tools just because they fly an older airplane.

This. I own 1/8 of a 1970 150 Aerobat with 1 Nav/Comm yet my DUAT printout is firmly clipped to my kneeboard.
 
Theres no reason that you can use modern technology flying a TriPacer. I swear people try to purposely date themselves by using ancient tools just because they fly an older airplane.
Install a G1000 or an FMS into a Tripacer and I'll then agree with you.
 
This. I own 1/8 of a 1970 150 Aerobat with 1 Nav/Comm yet my DUAT printout is firmly clipped to my kneeboard.
I'm not a Luddite. I use duats for flight planning (when I do any planning beyond "eh, that's plenty for a Haines round trip"). That's way too much work with a flight computer, whether mechanical or digital, especially around here where even VFR I seldom go direct due to terrain. But in the plane with me, I'd rather have the manual whiz wheel that I know how to work, that never runs out of batteries, and that I can tuck into the little gap between the pilot and copilot seats with my sectional and checklist. Plus it didn't cost me $80. And I've never met a flight student who could use their fancy electronic computer faster than I can use the whiz wheel. Finally, if you really know how to use it, I think it's capable of a little more than the electronic one.
 
If you're in a position where the time difference between a paper E6B and a digital one is a make or break thing on your writtens, ya might wanna study a little more. Just sayin'. If you know how to use the paper one, don't waste your money.

Well no one said it would make me or break me on the writtens. If you were in the position to judge my abilities based on what kind of flight computer I like to use you could say that. I have my own routine when taking written tests. I always do all calculation problems on writtens 2-3 times so time is important to me.

For me it came down to the fact that I'd psych myself out on tests, and even the simplest mundane tasks become more difficult. On a checkride, or bouncing around in turbulence, do I want to count tick marks or just get the number? I'll take the number. Between the Sportys E6B and the CX-2, I chose the CX-2 because of the display and the additional features. The Sportys version has a really simple LCD like the kind you would find on a 1980s calculator. The CX-2 has a much more complicated alphanumeric display and a cursor, allowing for a more dynamic menu structure and the ability to scroll through the input variables, change what you need to change and recalculate the problem if you make a mistake.

I'm a huge fan of the whiz wheel, slide rules and other old school technology - the use of which will put hair on your chest - but I'd rather just read a number off a screen and spend the time it would take to multitask flying an airplane and counting slide rule tick marks on something more productive... Like say looking out the window so I don't have a midair and DIE. :beer:

PS. Don't forget about Distance = Rate * Time. Works great for fuel burn too.

Excatly my thoughts
 
Install a G1000 or an FMS into a Tripacer and I'll then agree with you.

Sure, put equipment in an aircraft thats worth 1/4 the price of the equipment being installed... Theres no reason to be that extreme. iPad with Foreflight can serve that plane so so well.
 
Yes, Pepe... I don't expect an Airbus driver to be using an E6B, lol. I think once people get into turbine equipment they no longer have a need for an E6B.

I'm still flying GA and use my iPad with Foreflight if I'm in the US, or AirNavPro in Europe. Started flying in 1996 and was already using the CX1. Never felt the urge to use the whizwheel, and was never asked during a checkride...


---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=4.668167,-74.060363
 
I have yet to make the plunge and buy an IPAD with foreflight.. I'm getting close though, updating my VFR/IFR charts is getting pretty expensive.
 
Back
Top