Getting off the scab list

I didn't read all the thread. In fact, I'm entirely too lazy.

It comes down to this: DON'T SCAB.

Doesn't really matter if you're a believer in unions or not. You will face ramifications, either minor or major, for the rest of your career and life.

In this business if you think "I'm isolated from <insert any contingency you don't think you'll ever, EVER, EVAH be in>", you will have a rude awakening at one point. Until we all walk away, we won't know when the Aviation spectre is coming for us, and when our career will nose dive.
 
Just for my personal reference, when do I start knowing what I'm talking about? When I'm 30? When I buy a house? Have a kid? Have grandkids? Hit 40? 50? 60? When I have been through my first furlough? My second? Third?

When you're 36. Trust me, it's awesome.
 
This kind of juvenille crap.....not to mention some being criminal:

As a SCAB, he/she WILL NOT be able to commute to work and WILL NEVER be able to be employed by an ALPA carrier…ever again! He/she won't even be able to walk into the Crew Room!! And, he/she can expect: broken car windows; hate mail; flat tires; Crazy glue in his/her car door locks; an egged car; bananas up the tailpipe; missing V-file documents; feces in his/her V-file; threats in his/her V-file; hotel wake-up-calls at 3:30 am; and last but not least, to have his/her flight bag shipped to the ends of the earth if left anywhere unguarded.

....as well as the union members who openly and happily celebrate when a scab perishes in a plane crash, ala the Capt of Valujet 592, are items that reflect very negatively on the union as a whole. Whether sanctioned or not by the union itself, the actions of its members will reflect positively or negatively.
 
This kind of juvenille crap.....not to mention some being criminal:



....as well as the union members who openly and happily celebrate when a scab perishes in a plane crash, ala the Capt of Valujet 592, are items that reflect very negatively on the union as a whole. Whether sanctioned or not by the union itself, the actions of its members will reflect positively or negatively.

Thats a lot hatred and bitterness. I don't work for a 121 right now but when I go home for the day I try to leave work behind me and the drama that comes with it. I couldn't imagine smiling and feeling good about a co-worker dying such a terrible death... even if I couldn't stand them. Karma is a beach.
 
Thats a lot hatred and bitterness. I don't work for a 121 right now but when I go home for the day I try to leave work behind me and the drama that comes with it. I couldn't imagine smiling and feeling good about a co-worker dying such a terrible death... even if I couldn't stand them. Karma is a beach.

Yeah. Pretty sickening. Individuals who make the group look bad.
 
Random thought on this thread.

1) Everyone talks about Lorenzo as though he were singlehandedly responsible for the destruction of Eastern and the decimation of Continental. No one seems to remember, however, that both of these companies were losing money by the truckload (er, planeload?) BEFORE he ever came on the scene. Lorenzo was incompetent, no question, but he was just the latest of incompetents to run those companies.

2) Employees are paid by the company, yet for some reason, their loyalty is to the union, whom they pay dues to. Seems backward to me.

3) Union employees talk about how "we are the union" when it comes to making the union work, yet when it comes to the "consequences" (so-called) of scabbing, they act as though "the union" is some nameless, faceless entity that administers them.

4) The CAL scabs of '83, while generally reviled by the pilot population, kept CAL going until it could get things turned around. Were it not for them, there would be no CAL now. So the argument can be made that they did some good, after all.
 
I think that although unions still seem to be doing fairly well with airline membership, in general union membership though all industries is probably significantly lower percentage wise than it was generations ago.

There are many reasons for this ranging from the corporate bosses finding ways to discourage union memberships and/or shopping work out to subgroups that aren't unionized, all the way down to many younger people (myself included) don't see unions as a necessity or a useful tool.

Unions have a purpose, and had a purpose, far too often they get away from that purpose, or even worse in my opinion sacrifice the future in an effort to make today better.

Funny, I find the company has that exact same issue and the union is there to protect me from that attitude.
 
Ok, I googled it and there is no definition for "disputed pairing", and while I have heard the term before I don't know what it means, someone want to enlighten me?

They're basically just pairings that the union has determined are fatigue-inducing. While people may be looked down upon for picking them up, they certainly aren't "scabs."

Random thought on this thread.

1) Everyone talks about Lorenzo as though he were singlehandedly responsible for the destruction of Eastern and the decimation of Continental. No one seems to remember, however, that both of these companies were losing money by the truckload (er, planeload?) BEFORE he ever came on the scene. Lorenzo was incompetent, no question, but he was just the latest of incompetents to run those companies.

You need to learn some history. Lorenzo wasn't "incompetent." Far from it. He was very good at what he did. He was a corporate raider. He had no desire to turn Eastern into anything other than an ATM to finance his other airline operations. His game plan from the day he purchased EAL was to siphon away EAL's assets to CAL, because his goal was to turn CAL into the largest airline in the country. EAL was going to be sacrificed (along with its thousands of employees and their families). You should do some reading into how Lorenzo took System One, EAL's groundbreaking reservations system, and sold it to his Texas Air Corporation for a steal. After he did that, he leased the software back to EAL at an exorbitant rate. It was a way for him to siphon away EAL's cash to TAC so it could be used to grow CAL. He did the same with countless other EAL assets, sending them all to TAC and CAL while EAL withered on the vine.

2) Employees are paid by the company, yet for some reason, their loyalty is to the union, whom they pay dues to. Seems backward to me.

One of ALPA's old volunteers from many years ago: "The airline signs my pay check, but ALPA fills in the amount."

3) Union employees talk about how "we are the union" when it comes to making the union work, yet when it comes to the "consequences" (so-called) of scabbing, they act as though "the union" is some nameless, faceless entity that administers them.

Not sure what you're trying to say here. Clarify?

4) The CAL scabs of '83, while generally reviled by the pilot population, kept CAL going until it could get things turned around. Were it not for them, there would be no CAL now. So the argument can be made that they did some good, after all.

It didn't take scabs to save CAL. The legitimate CAL pilots were hard working and dedicated employees who loved CAL, and they would have been happy to keep CAL going while management worked on rebuilding it in a legitimate fashion. Instead, Lorenzo decided to take the easy way out and utilize a bankruptcy code filled with loopholes to abrogate contract after contract, and then use his scabs to keep things going while he screwed everyone over, from employees, to lessors, to suppliers.
 
Very informative thread for us foreign pilots. We have a very strong union culture in France, as you all know with the strikes, but that has kept us from this race to the bottom for the workers, and to the ever more for shareholders.
 
You need to learn some history. Lorenzo wasn't "incompetent." Far from it. He was very good at what he did. He was a corporate raider. He had no desire to turn Eastern into anything other than an ATM to finance his other airline operations. His game plan from the day he purchased EAL was to siphon away EAL's assets to CAL, because his goal was to turn CAL into the largest airline in the country. EAL was going to be sacrificed (along with its thousands of employees and their families). You should do some reading into how Lorenzo took System One, EAL's groundbreaking reservations system, and sold it to his Texas Air Corporation for a steal. After he did that, he leased the software back to EAL at an exorbitant rate. It was a way for him to siphon away EAL's cash to TAC so it could be used to grow CAL. He did the same with countless other EAL assets, sending them all to TAC and CAL while EAL withered on the vine.

He did those things AFTER it became apparent that Eastern's unions would rather burn it to the ground then give up anything to Lorenzo. I know my history just fine. And I can't say I blame him, either. If you had invested that kind of money in something, wouldn't you make sure that you got a return on it one way or the other?
 
Not sure what you're trying to say here. Clarify?

Meaning that when union employees complain about how the union is ineffective, the union response is "You're the union, get involved." But when union employees pull thug and goon tactics, the response is "The union doesn't condone such activities," as though it were some outside influence that's throwing eggs and crapping in flight bags.
 
He did those things AFTER it became apparent that Eastern's unions would rather burn it to the ground then give up anything to Lorenzo. I know my history just fine. And I can't say I blame him, either. If you had invested that kind of money in something, wouldn't you make sure that you got a return on it one way or the other?

Wow.
 
He did those things AFTER it became apparent that Eastern's unions would rather burn it to the ground then give up anything to Lorenzo. I know my history just fine. And I can't say I blame him, either. If you had invested that kind of money in something, wouldn't you make sure that you got a return on it one way or the other?

I thought our website was a little more informative than that. Wow! Boy have I failed.
 
He did those things AFTER it became apparent that Eastern's unions would rather burn it to the ground then give up anything to Lorenzo. I know my history just fine. And I can't say I blame him, either. If you had invested that kind of money in something, wouldn't you make sure that you got a return on it one way or the other?

Along the lines of your thought process. If an employee invests that kind of time in a company, shouldn't he expect a return on his investment?
 
Back
Top