This guy is my hero...

Can you explain that more? I think it does depend on aircraft. I've heard anecdotal evidence that the CRJ200 is never to be slipped. A Ca I flew with who used to fly freight performed a slip in the sim with a Bombardier test pilOt riding right seat, and the test pilot's reaction was one of "WTH are you doing, this aircraft can't do that!"
No doubt there are flap configurations that prevent one fly using certain tools that may be available on other aircraft. I had the chance to do FULL STALLS in the 737 and it was as simple as the stalls in a C-150. Lower the nose, add power and fly out. Simple.
And too, there is a lot of stuff out there that is not fact but is a result of training. For example, the early Learjets (23,24,25) have a bad rep as being difficult to lfy and unforgiving. Not so. The 20 series were fast machines but if you flew them per the book, you were rewarded with a good response.
And too, usually airplanes will tell you when they don't like what you are doing. For example, with the 737 there is a buzz that starts before the shaker and it continues to develop to the point where you are in the shaker but the WHOLE airplane is buffeting as though, "HEY DUMBASS.. this ain't flying. Do you really want to do this?"
we live in a period where airplanes now talk to you unlike early airplanes (30s-40s-50s) where if you did stuff there was little to no warning. They simple tried to kill you.
 
"Podunk traffic Skyhawk 6789 short approach 35."

I have been tempted to go get a white shirt with epaulets and put 20 strips on it, walk into the FBO all smug and get into my cessna... even better if it was a cirrus... especially at a airport with a flight school. Other option would be to walk in with gym shorts and a beater on or maybe pajamas and go flying.
The dispatcher at my school just bought the new Lightspeeds with bluetooth. He said they work even out of the plane. I dared him to put on a uniform and the headset and walk into Walmart talking on his phone with the bluetooth. He then dared one of the other students to do it. In the end, no one would, but I think it would be funny (especially in Daytona). ;)
 
Absolutely, 100% kickass. Couldn't agree more, and the presentation was just the icing on the cake. That guy has even more stripes than I do! You should listen to him!

Also, WRT what an airplane can or can't do: "We" (not me, obviously) used to do patterns in 210s and Barons that make the "short" one in the video look like a 747 pattern. Sometimes in formation. Never scratched the paint.

If, for some weird reason, you were in an MU-2 and wanted to get on the ground in a hurry (Obviously, no conscientious 135 pilot would ever be in a hurry...you're a Professional...whatever that means) you could pop flaps 40 and land like a vastly overpowered cub...I've uh heard of them stopping in 1000ft.

Now, I'm not recommending any of these things...particularly not in a JEEETTTTTTTTT. But the notion that you have to fly a 5 mile final in ANYTHING, let alone a 152, is absurd. Not just absurd, but stupid, and indicative of not being a master of the airplane. Let me just sit back in my rocker for a second and smoke on my corn cob pipe and say (without offense, nothing an old guy in a rocker says can ever be offensive): Kids these days fly numbers, not wings, and that's not just dumb, it's dangerous...way more dangerous than flying an airplane within its design parameters.

PS. Get off my lawn.
 
Now, I'm not recommending any of these things...particularly not in a JEEETTTTTTTTT. But the notion that you have to fly a 5 mile final in ANYTHING, let alone a 152, is absurd. Not just absurd, but stupid, and indicative of not being a master of the airplane. Let me just sit back in my rocker for a second and smoke on my corn cob pipe and say (without offense, nothing an old guy in a rocker says can ever be offensive): Kids these days fly numbers, not wings, and that's not just dumb, it's dangerous...way more dangerous than flying an airplane within its design parameters.

PS. Get off my lawn.

Unfortunately company procedure almost prohibits us from anything inside of 5 mile final, now. Used to could Do a 2.5 mile pattern easy-peezy in a CRJ, but now we have a requirement to be stable at 1000' (on centerline/loc, PAPI/GS, Vref fully configured, all checklists done)...
 
Unfortunately company procedure almost prohibits us from anything inside of 5 mile final, now. Used to could Do a 2.5 mile pattern easy-peezy in a CRJ, but now we have a requirement to be stable at 1000' (on centerline/loc, PAPI/GS, Vref fully configured, all checklists done)...


How do you guys do the Expressway Visual 31 in LGA or the Parkway to 13L/R in JFK or River Visual 19 at DCA?
 
Unfortunately company procedure almost prohibits us from anything inside of 5 mile final, now. Used to could Do a 2.5 mile pattern easy-peezy in a CRJ, but now we have a requirement to be stable at 1000' (on centerline/loc, PAPI/GS, Vref fully configured, all checklists done)...

Sounds like you need a little fun in your life! Go find a plane to rent. The hell with 45dg... Abeam the numbers, power to idle. Point the stick at the numbers, bury the opposite rudder & fall out of the sky like a waxed manhole cover, kick it out & stick it on the numbers! Technically you're stabilized, and it's one helluva good time!
 
How do you guys do the Expressway Visual 31 in LGA or the Parkway to 13L/R in JFK or River Visual 19 at DCA?

Good question. I brought this up with our FOQA team and the answer seemed to be: talk to the standards folks in our base.

The FOQA admin's personal thought on it is "if it's charted, you can abide by the charted standards and still be considered stable."

The new 1000' rule was meant to reel in the cowboy ways of some of our guys..... mostly CA's, mind you, with FO's not willing to call the Go Around...
 
Unfortunately company procedure almost prohibits us from anything inside of 5 mile final, now. Used to could Do a 2.5 mile pattern easy-peezy in a CRJ, but now we have a requirement to be stable at 1000' (on centerline/loc, PAPI/GS, Vref fully configured, all checklists done)...

Lol, I have a "friend" that's been known to not be stable until 100', then use the last 10 seconds to stabilize up and land. Single pilot is good stuff.
 
The dispatcher at my school just bought the new Lightspeeds with bluetooth. He said they work even out of the plane. I dared him to put on a uniform and the headset and walk into Walmart talking on his phone with the bluetooth. He then dared one of the other students to do it. In the end, no one would, but I think it would be funny (especially in Daytona). ;)

I would do it.
 
Better Hero.

[video=youtube;T0_eiE74JbY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0_eiE74JbY[/video]
Ha! I know that dude too! He kept coming by and chatting while I was changing a cylinder on the ramp at an HNS! He's a pretty funny dude to talk to.
*edit* just watched the video, that's pretty much exactly how he talks in real life.
 
Surprised to see none of these posts address busy patterns. Sometimes its simply not an option to keep things as tight as they should be. At the non-towered airport I fly out of it is common to see at least 3-4 planes in the pattern at a time.

That's...that's...you know, I could crack fun at you in so many different ways, but I'll refrain. Let me just say that it is entirely possible fit 5 planes into a normal sized pattern to one runway at an uncontrolled field. Used to do it every day back in college without issue. At GFK (towered), it wasn't uncommon to see as many as 10 planes in the pattern with maybe a mile extended upwind (sorry, departure) and downwind legs. If people are flying patterns correctly and doing what they're supposed to, you can fit a lot of aircraft in a small amount of airspace safely.
 
Back
Top