Inverted, that second pic is awesome! Although I have no idea what it is, I loooooove that plane. What is it?
Siai Marchetti SF260
Very cool thanks.
...it's just a guess though.
Best looking classic in my logbook....
Winner here IMHO. A-10, -117 and Phantom.....all dream machines to me. Hacker has to take a close second though. @ Bunk, yeah the T-45 leaves something to be desired performance wise, esp for advanced stage stuff (ie ACM)....would have given my left nut to fly a TA-4J....by now they probably would have gotten the big motors in use elsewhere, and glass cockpits. Still a cool little jet though!
Yep its a Marchetti SF260.
![]()
There is talk about putting a new motor in it with a burner but then how long could you stay up, 15-20 minutes? It already has little to no fuel. The Navy should have made the Goshawk an intermediate trainer and kept the Skyhawk or gone with a more advanced jet trainer (if the money was there of course). Countries like S. Korea have the T-50 for their advanced training, about as close as one can get to the real thing. I think it has the Hornet engine in it, goes Mach 1.2, can turn and fight with the big boys. Such is money now days. I think versions of the Hawk 100/200 have an interchangeable cockpit so that the Hornet's cockpit can be put in it...or whatever jet you want. I will say though the T-45 is superior to the T-2C in terms of performance. Some of my Hornet buddies love it and some are so so about it. I'm a former COD guy so I'm loving it![]()
I may have misunderstood you, but that's not an A-4 of any stripe. That's a Bae Hawk we bought and cleverly renamed. Welcome to the multi-national conglomerate world.
Nope, you were right. I just misidentified it. Proves that the handheld device is still not always the best for looking a pictures. Does look pretty similar though except for the missing "hump" from the D and E models and the leading edge lift devices. How did you end up scoring time in that?
Not the actual one, cannot find a pic of it.
![]()
In hindsight, it is so simple compared to the Hornet (or I'd guess the COD as well), so it is probably a refreshing airplane to go back to at some point in your career. Save the limited legs (legacy Hornet shortcoming too), and it's runway/offroading prone antics, it is a great little ride. But I agree, there should be a better stepping stone from advanced to whatever flavor of Hornet most studs go to the fleet to fly. Having dual engine training prior to the FRS could be a bonus as well....in terms of learning those skills of compound EP management and getting a jet safely on deck vice shelling out
Bunk is an instructor in Kingsville (one of the 3 bases we have T-45's at)
Do I have to pick just one?
![]()