Flew the Skycatcher Today

Yep. Two 200 pounders leaves room for about 12 gallons of gas (half tanks).
Impressive.

:tmyk:

Nope. There are old J3's, Aeronca's (even military Champs), Taylorcrafts, Ercoupes, Porterfields and Luscombes that all meet the requirements of a sport pilot. Its done all the time, and I've done it. Certain models of each vintage meet the requirements and certain models don't. Buyer beware, people try to advertise planes that can't be operated as a sport pilot as being sport pilot eligible, in an effort to increase the value of the plane. The only requirement for a sport pilot is that the plane meets the requirements in FAR 1.1.

That said, they could try to build the Cessna 120 as an S-LSA, but it would probably have ended up being as much work as the 162 was, and would have had a much more limited market.

I'm told that a local operator has no intentions of offering sport pilot training despite having some of the buck-sixty-twos on the way. Insurance, or something like that. Naturally, this disqualifies a good portion of the airplane's intended audience.

Airplane single-engine land is single-engine land, he said, as he sauntered to the flight line to strap into the 172...
 
In the course of searching for a "low time" 152 for our flying club I came across an ad for a 1979 model with "536 original hours, hangared all its life, stored as a collector's item, original paint/engine/interior/glass in perfect condition." The photos in the ad seemed to confirm this, the airplane really did look great.

The price? 75,000$ That's how hard it is to find a low time 152 right now. And with an engine that's 31 years old and hasn't been overhauled, expect to pay for that right away, roughly 20,000$.

Looking at controller there are 15 152's for sale and the average total time is over 8000 hours. The highest time airframe has 14000 hours, there are two of them available with that kind of time, the lowest time has 2500 hours (tailwheel converted, privately owned). One of the 14,000 hour airframes available is our club's previous 152. Please take a look, the price is great for a time builder and I can assure you it's been well maintained.

We eventually settled on one that had 2300 hours and a damage history (nose gear collapse at least twice, not uncommon for a trainer), but it seems to have been well repaired. All told, after repairs and upgrades, paint and interior to bring it to our standards we will have paid roughly 45,000$ which is a slight discount from what we'd expect to pay for a similar time airframe that did not need paint or interior.

so this one is in our colors and will last us until such time as we can pick up a 162 to replace it on the used market.

It's a 152 killer, and the 152 needs killin' ;)
 
Oh also, check this out:

N7187C is listed as a 1973 A152 S/N 681

Confusing right?

It's the 152 prototype, which was originally a 1973 150L, it was modified and re-registered as a 152 and later on they modified it and re-registered it again to test the A152 Aerobat mods. It's now registered to an owner in Nebraska.

ordering parts for it must be a blast ;)
 
adk, where did you fly the Skycatcher out from? Was the C162 up for rental or did you only go up for a demo flight??
 
adk, where did you fly the Skycatcher out from? Was the C162 up for rental or did you only go up for a demo flight??

Friend of a friend of a friend of a Cessna rep. Just the right place at the right time.
 
Oh also, check this out:

N7187C is listed as a 1973 A152 S/N 681

Confusing right?

It's the 152 prototype, which was originally a 1973 150L, it was modified and re-registered as a 152 and later on they modified it and re-registered it again to test the A152 Aerobat mods. It's now registered to an owner in Nebraska.

ordering parts for it must be a blast ;)

I know the owner and have seen this plane up close.

It's got a cool history, but as it sits, it looks like it needs some serious TLC. Kind of a shame, considering its historical value. I'd love to see it restored.
 
I know the owner and have seen this plane up close.

It's got a cool history, but as it sits, it looks like it needs some serious TLC. Kind of a shame, considering its historical value. I'd love to see it restored.


Any chance of some photos? Curiosity you know :)
 
Back
Top