IFR takeoff minimums

[SteveC]

if you have data for single engine climb to the top of the DP and data for climb performance loss in turns. Also that single engine data cannot be extrapolated ie some aircraft do have ten minute charts for climbs at v2 but those charts are typically not FAA approved (no concern for 91 ops).

We are currently phasing in APG performance analysis, and OpsSpec approval is pending.

 

[400A]

We are currently phasing in APG performance analysis, and OpsSpec approval is pending.

You wanna help me get my DO on board. Grrrrr

 

[The Gardener]

Uh...
Not if you follow the departure procedure.

And your engine(s) keep working.

I wont do it. Maybe it is just another thing I'm superstitious about. Just seems like a bad idea to me.

If it can't be done legally in a 777, I doubt I'm capable of doing it safely in a C-172.

 

[Aviator_Bakeek]

Sec. 91.13 - Careless or reckless operation.

(a) Aircraft operations for the purpose of air navigation. No person may operate an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another.


I would think in a legal battle against the FAA if anything were to happen taking off in 0/0, this would be the reg that would "seal your casket".

Every situation is different for each person in any given area, but for me, where I fly, and my situations, approach minimums are good for me.

 

[Roger, Roger]

If it can't be done legally in a 777, I doubt I'm capable of doing it safely in a C-172.

I'm sure you are capable of doing it in a 172. Whether or not it's a good idea to do it day in and day out...that's a different matter.