UND now a step closer to "an actual airline"

If you're using the checklist as you're supposed to (I.E. Do then VERIFY) that won't be a problem. Again, mountains out of molehills, folks.

Seriously, won't this be a checklist item? Are you really complaining about something that will be covered by a checklist?


Kevin
 
Sure, when is the heat meant to be turned on, before or after encountering icing?

It is also right there in the certification regs I posted. The pitot heat is there to PREVENT malfunctions due to icing. Prevent is the definition of ANTI ICE. Removal is DE ICE. That isn't to say that ANTI ICE cannot or will not remove ice, ie carb heat.
Alright, so if it's removing ice from the pitot tube, you're telling me it's 'anti-icing' the tube only because the main intent of having pitot heat is to prevent ice? :insane: You said it yourself: removal is de-ice. You're arguing semantics. ;)
 
Alright, so if it's removing ice from the pitot tube, you're telling me it's 'anti-icing' the tube only because the main intent of having pitot heat is to prevent ice? :insane: You said it yourself: removal is de-ice. You're arguing semantics. ;)


You really don't understand the difference between anti ice and de ice?

Pitot heat isn't meant to REMOVE ice, it is meant to prevent it from forming in the first place. Yes, it can remove certain amounts of ice if ice were to build up with the heat off, but that isn't very smart to wait until you get an airspeed malfunction to turn the pitot heat on.

It isn't semantics, it is definitions and proper use of aircraft systems.
 
Yes, it can remove certain amounts of ice if ice were to build up with the heat off, but that isn't very smart to wait until you get an airspeed malfunction to turn the pitot heat on.
Right, well, no one here said pitot heat was to be used differently. However, pitot heat CAN remove traces of ice, and we call that 'de-ice', chief. There's no other term for it. ;)
 
I can't wait for the first lawsuit when a student preflighting a quick-turn with a piping-hot pitot tube decides that feeling it with his mouth is a good idea. Thank you to students from a certain airline from the world's most populous country for making me redefine my definition of aeronautical stupidity.
 
I can't wait for the first lawsuit when a student preflighting a quick-turn with a piping-hot pitot tube decides that feeling it with his mouth is a good idea. Thank you to students from a certain airline from the world's most populous country for making me redefine my definition of aeronautical stupidity.

What does Air China and sucking a pitot tube have anything to do with each other? Furthermore, where do you get the idea that someone would suck a pitot tube?
 
On 12/13/2009 A Seminole lost pilot/static due to moisture collecting and freezing in the system.

On 12/14/2009 On takeoff in a seminole the airspeed indicator reached 46 knots and froze due to frozen moisture in the pitot system and the takeoff was aborted.
 
Pitot heat on the moment the student is cleared for takeoff is pointless. From that moment how long until the airplane lifts the ground? 15-20 seconds? Most planes here when we turn on the pitot heat, it takes a good 30 sec to a minute to feel any warmth in the tube during preflight..in cold weather... so yeah if it takes that long, good luck melting any ice during the roll.
 
Pitot heat on the moment the student is cleared for takeoff is pointless. From that moment how long until the airplane lifts the ground? 15-20 seconds? Most planes here when we turn on the pitot heat, it takes a good 30 sec to a minute to feel any warmth in the tube during preflight..in cold weather... so yeah if it takes that long, good luck melting any ice during the roll.

If you have ice on the roll to begin with, taking off is probably not the smartest course of action.
 
If you have ice on the roll to begin with, taking off is probably not the smartest course of action.
Please read:
oktex88 said:
On 12/13/2009 A Seminole lost pilot/static due to moisture collecting and freezing in the system.

On 12/14/2009 On takeoff in a seminole the airspeed indicator reached 46 knots and froze due to frozen moisture in the pitot system and the takeoff was aborted.

Do you really think the pilots were able to see the moisture in the system? The ice wasn't covering the mast.
 
Back
Top