* Improve Emergency Medical Services (EMS) operations, including equipping aircraft with terrain awareness and warning systems (TAWS).
What kind of scenarios?I can't believe we still measure commercial pilots based on stick skills in a lazy 8 and chandelle versus scenario based training and decision making skills...
I think thats why it is basically impossible to land a job at 250. Unless it was Mesa in 2007...I can't believe we still measure commercial pilots based on stick skills in a lazy 8 and chandelle versus scenario based training and decision making skills...
I think thats why it is basically impossible to land a job at 250. Unless it was Mesa in 2007...
I can't believe we still measure commercial pilots based on stick skills in a lazy 8 and chandelle versus scenario based training and decision making skills...
I'd rather fly with some of the lower time guys I've flown with than the higher time guys that have gotten away with everything and think that it's okay to continue to do so. Like making up V-speeds and power settings and intentionally wanting to overload an aircraft (beyond both MZFW and MGTOW). The lower time guys I've flown with have tended to be more on the conservative side of things, which I'm more than okay with.I don't really understand why an FO would need to have an ATP. I haven't flown in the airline environment, so I really don't know how much risk is increased when flying with a low time FO.
You mean almost ever regional in 2007? Even Eagle lowered thirds to 450 near the end of the boom.
If the low time FO's were a real hazard to flight safety then I would think we would be seeing many more accidents.
I'd rather fly with some of the lower time guys I've flown with than the higher time guys that have gotten away with everything and think that it's okay to continue to do so. Like making up V-speeds and power settings and intentionally wanting to overload an aircraft (beyond both MZFW and MGTOW). The lower time guys I've flown with have tended to be more on the conservative side of things, which I'm more than okay with.
-mini
That said, I think there should be a multi crew rating...
As in an additional rating to fly a multi crew airplane, or a rating to cirumvent the typical route?
Heck, when I worked in Air EMS, *I* was the TAWS system.
"Rising terrain, right side, sir."
Sometimes I'm forced to wonder where people get these ideas.