PCL and the ALPA cheerleaders in 3...2...1
So, lets START the discussion with a slam at ALPA. There are plenty of dues paying airline pilots that are opposed to this. I'm just not one of them. So let's not tar ALPA with this kind of smear.
I really don't see what the big deal is here to get in line with the rest of the world.
Agreed. The "big deal" seems to be the GA attitude of entitlement is on display for all to see. Fatcats and bigwigs whining about user fees and the FLAPS falling right into line to protect their entitlement.
I guess its a good thing I bought an RV instead of an IFR-capable airplane for my recreation.
That's why I bought a Vmax. If you can afford an airplane and fuel, then find a way to afford the fees for using the ATC system. If you can't, fly VFR and stay out of controlled airspace. I'll bet you can find PLENTY of that around the U.S.
Heck, go to Alaska. GA is alive and well up north. Pat can show you around.
Because we are Americans and we shouldn't have to pay for anything that is so darn expensive. Also we are drama queens
Its a question of allocating resources. If FLAPing around in your Cessna is that important, give up something else.
GA is dying in the United States anyway unfortunetly.
Frankly, its about time. Talk about a WASTE of money and energy resources. "Hey, let's fire up the Piper and fly to Missoula for a burger."
Want our airspace modernized? Someone is going to need to pay for it. Much rather have it paid for by those who use it than taken out of my paycheck.
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
..or, how many airline delays are caused from too many Cessnas, or even Gulfstreams trying to get into JFK?
Well, if you KNEW anything about airspace management, you'd know the airspace around NYC knits ALL the airports together. So what happens at JFK, LGA and EWR is also effected by TEB, HPN and all the GA airports in the area. So, the answer to your smartass question is...plenty.
Would you have felt that way back in the day when you were training?
Actually, yes. We pretty much went where we wanted to in South Texas. Perhaps GA should move their training sites to places like that instead of South Florida, etc.
I'm not sure what you mean by non biased. Aviation user fees will choke and kill small 135's and the average small aircraft owner. How is what will happen be biased. Does anyone dispute this?
Yeah, I will. The 135s will either pass the charges on to the customers or go out of business. But, the checks have to move, so I'm thinking the former rather than the latter.
No, it seems he is the I got mine screw you type of guy now that he is a big airline pilot.
Your anger and bitterness destroys any little measure of credibility you ever had.
Very disappointing Mark.
Seems like along with representation you've become nothing but an ALPA talking head who forgot where he came from.
What a shame.
Again, another gratuitous slam at ALPA. In addition, its a personal attack on a guy who has proven to be probably the MOST selfless guy on this website. He put EVERYTHING on the line to organize Colgan and then IMMEDIATELY got thrown into the fire of the worst commercial aviation accident in the last 7 years. Just because he doesn't support YOUR agenda.
YOU owe Seggy an apology.
So what do you propose they do? Sit on their ass and wait for it to happen? That would make a lot of sense. I promise that if this comes to fruition, that most of the money WILL be diverted into other programs.
In the courtroom that is called, "Assuming a fact not in evidence." It reflects lazy logical thinking.
I never thought I was rich as an enlisted dude in the Air Force, but somehow I own an airplane.
Your political tirade aside, if you own an airplane, you've allocated your resources to do so. I guess you'll have to remain VFR if you don't want to participate in the NAS. If you do, pay up.
What is the deal with some of the union pilots that so supportive of this tax? More pulling up of the ladder?
I LOVE this who "PUL" argument. If you believe the theory of supply and demand, a reduction in the pilot pool WOULD help raise wages of currently employed pilots. However, the industry doesn't work that way. And unless you're an incredible neophyte, you would know that.
So I am not the only one to notice this, huh? I think my Granddad was right about ALPA.
Great. A gratuitous "Grandad" slam at ALPA. That REALLY bolsters your "argument".
I guess they think it will help the airlines operationally (but it won't), so I guess they think they might be able to get a pay raise because the airlines are making more money (which won't happen). They'll just schedule more flights and charge less for the seats, all the while destroying general aviation.
Sure it will help. Get the FLAPS out of the NAS. Come out and fly a couple days around SNA. If you had more experience on a national/international level, you'd understand that. I would think you'd have some inkling even with your limited experience.
Wow, attacks on someone's character, what a logical way to advance an argument.
Its the last refuge of scoundrels who are scared poopless that their free ride is over.
How many people will this put out on the street? == a lot.
Again, "Fact not in evidence." The upside is that it may HELP military aviation recruiting. Ever consider that?
Ahh...I've got bad news for you; most of us here didn't exactly come from the slums.
Yep. If you want it bad enough, you'll find a way. If you want to own a GA airplane you'll find a way. If you can't afford it, find another "sport."
Speak for yourself. I wasn't from the slums, but I sure as hell wasn't from the suburbs.
There you go. And you found a way to get your licenses. Doctors find ways to finance their educations. Why do you think pilot students deserve government/airline subsidies for the services they use?