surreal1221
Well-Known Member
I do say no to RJDC. 

As long as DALPA doesn't press the issue with them, the fetid corpse of the RJDC remains buried.
But yes, it is all about perspective. The same perspective that created the first RJDC issues is the same perspective and power grab that will ignore RJDC v2.0.
Just say no to RJDC. :banghead:
I won't feel safe until the fetid corpses of Ford and Cooksey themselves remain buried.
Oye. Have you been flying with Johnny B. lately? The ATR lifers are corrupting the RJ ranks now.
Plus it only applies to future airplanes, and if I remember correctly DL is already at its maximum limit of 70+ seat airplanes.
Johnny B. isnt JoeMerchant, is it?
Well, they did just extend it 26 more airframes, so that proves there's no hard limit. And if it's just for new aircraft, why even have the LOA unless there's some future plans in the works....