US Airways pilots' seniority disputes may muddle merger

derg

Apparently a "terse" writer
Staff member
From: http://www.azcentral.com/business/news/articles/20130306union-fears-muddle-merger.html



US Airways pilots' seniority disputes may muddle merger


L169_CIFRc3daf368797b6ec0296bda62da5856a3.jpg

US Airways jets (front) sit at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix.
Michael Chow/The Republic
By Ryan RandazzoThe Republic | azcentral.comThu Mar 7, 2013 11:55 AM
The union representing pilots from the old US Airways has asked the judge in American Airlines’ bankruptcy case to keep pilots from the former America West from interfering with the current megamerger.




The bankrupt American Airlines announced Feb. 14 it intends to merge with Tempe-based US Airways, creating the world’s largest airline. That deal must be approved by the bankruptcy court.

Former America West pilots in Phoenix have been fighting over seniority since their company’s 2005 merger with US Airways, and the battle threatens to disrupt the current merger with American.

A group representing the former America West pilots, known as Leonidas, told the US Airways union last month that it would sue and seek an injunction of the merger if the America West pilots don’t get their way.

Based on that notice, the US Airline Pilots Association on Wednesday filed a complaint with the court, asserting that Leonidas has “impermissibly interfered” with the bankruptcy court.

“If (Leonidas) is permitted to prosecute … there is no question that the action itself would distract parties … from the important negotiations and tasks attendant to the merger,” the union said in its court filing.

The union also said if Leonidas interferes with the American merger it would violate the bankruptcy code.

The pilots based in Phoenix support the new merger with American but want to get the seniority they believe they are due from the company’s last big merger.

About 98 percent of the Phoenix pilots voted in favor of a deal negotiating pay raises and other working rules for the American merger, according to the union’s court filing. But that memorandum of understanding was neutral on the touchy subject of seniority.

Seniority determines the pay, work schedules, promotions and who gets cut first when flights are reduced.
With the American merger, pilots will have to negotiate yet another seniority list. Before they do so, the US Airways pilot groups will have to sort out their own East-West seniority issues.

US Airways was in bankruptcy when the solvent America West merged with the bigger airline. America West pilots argued that because their company salvaged US Airways, they should get seniority.

US Airways pilots argued that years of service should determine seniority, which favors them because their airline was older.

In 2007, a federal arbitrator named George Nicolau created a blended seniority list for America West and US Airways pilots. The former US Airways pilots didn’t like that deal because it put some of their pilots below America West pilots.

The Wednesday complaint they filed in court said the so-called Nicolau award put “America West pilots still on probation and in ground school above US Airways pilots with more than 16 years of seniority.”

Because the US Airways pilots outnumber the America West pilots about 2-1, they were able to vote out the old union in favor of the US Airline Pilots Association. They never adopted the so-called Nicolau award. The pilots have separate contracts, and none has had a raise since the merger.

Pilots who flew for America West are represented by the USAPA but say the union has not represented their interests in the seniority dispute.

“How can USAPA exclusively represent US Airways pilots and simultaneously negotiate with the West pilots? They can’t,” Leonidas wrote to members last month. “When attempting to negotiate with West pilots, USAPA defaults to what it has always done — representing just the East pilots.”

Several legal actions have led to the 9th Circuit Court, where an appeal filed by US Airways is proceeding.

Federal legislation known as the McCaskill-Bond amendment passed in 2008 governs seniority integration in airline mergers.
 
And this is just the beginning? I don't think the word "ugly" would be appropriate enough to describe where this is going.
 
Methinks they're trying to conduct (well, shove-thru) a seniority list integration with American "as is" without respecting the "Nicolau Award."
 
Heh.

Main thing I remember from the HP/US merger was some West dude declaring the process a "tyranny of the majority" and some East dude saying, "no, I call that democracy," and then everyones' menses synchronized.

I wish I could find that video.
 
Heh.

Main thing I remember from the HP/US merger was some West dude declaring the process a "tyranny of the majority" and some East dude saying, "no, I call that democracy," and then everyones' menses synchronized.

I wish I could find that video.
Wait, let me Google that for you — Part 1 of many:
 
Questions: any plausible scenarios where former TWA guys become a 4th party to this or is that all water under the bridge (well, legally anyway) at this point?
 
Isn't it union policy that seniority integration be based on a date of hire?

Hell no.

And if not, why not?

Because date of hire is largely irrelevant when merging two seniority lists. Companies had different years of mass hiring, different years of furloughs, different years of mass retirements, etc. DOH is only relevant within a single company. What matters is bidding priority.
 
Isn't it union policy that seniority integration be based on a date of hire? And if not, why not?

I'm new to the 121 world, but I know there are a few different ways to approach it.
- You can go by date of hire. Everyone is in line based on logetivity, but now the guy that was looking at an upgrade at Airline X is now back on reserve for MergedAir.
- You can do it based on relative seniority. For example, Pilot A at 65% seniority at Airline X will be at 65% in the new list, but behind Pilot B that's 64.9% at Airline Y, regardless of date of hire. Every keeps their relative seniority at MergedAir, but if A has been at X for 10 years, and B has only been at Y for 6 years, A is pissed that he's now behind a guy that has less longetivity than him. Personally, I think it's the fairest way to go about it, but then again, I've never had to deal with mergers.
- Then there's the "Hey, we're buying you, you're all stapled to the bottom now" way. Pilot cohesion at it's finest.
 
I'm new to the 121 world, but I know there are a few different ways to approach it.
- You can go by date of hire. Everyone is in line based on logetivity, but now the guy that was looking at an upgrade at Airline X is now back on reserve for MergedAir.
- You can do it based on relative seniority. For example, Pilot A at 65% seniority at Airline X will be at 65% in the new list, but behind Pilot B that's 64.9% at Airline Y, regardless of date of hire. Every keeps their relative seniority at MergedAir, but if A has been at X for 10 years, and B has only been at Y for 6 years, A is pissed that he's now behind a guy that has less longetivity than him. Personally, I think it's the fairest way to go about it, but then again, I've never had to deal with mergers.
- Then there's the "Hey, we're buying you, you're all stapled to the bottom now" way. Pilot cohesion at it's finest.
The latter, I believe, is illegal, thanks to the Senator from TWA.

The former means it's better to be old.

The middle preserves career expectations.

Pick your poison.
 
Back
Top