The Guy Who Won't Put Away His Laptop

Vyse

Vyse

BirchJet CA
Friend saw this on a flight last week, was curious what the pros think of this one:

During takeoff/landing, the crew makes the usual announcement to turn off all electronic devices. Passenger ignores the announcement and continues to work on his laptop. The third time the flight attendants come through the cabin asking him to turn it off, he sighs, closes his laptop and puts it in the seat pocket.

As the plane makes its takeoff/landing, the passenger, seeing that the flight attendants are now strapped in and can't stop him, takes out the laptop and continues to use it until the flight attendants are unseated.

What could the captain do? If it's a landing, the flight has arrived at its destination so ejecting him from the flight seems pointless. Bust him for willfully disobeying a crew member? Or do you just leave the matters to the FAs to handle it.

Variation: you're dead heading, and you're sitting next to this guy.
 
I take a peanut and flick it at just the right angle off the seat in front of him so it ricochet's into his throat while he is laughing about outsmarting the FA's. He gags, dies and then I grab his laptop and give it to the FA telling her/him that my sleeping friend feels so bad he would like to have her/him keep it as a token of his appreciation for all the hard work and customer abuse they must endure.
 
IMO 9 times out of 10, the captain probably wouldn't hear about it until after landing. The 1 time probably depends on the captain. If a flight attendant called me and told me about this, I would imagine they felt it was a bigger issue than just someone won't put away their laptop and deal with it over the PA.
 
Mr_Creepy said:
They've yet to prove that laptops are dangerous anyway.
Click to expand...

A flying laptop could be pretty dangerous. Also, if he has his tray down and he's in an aisle seat he could potentially be trapping people if there was a need to evacuate.
 
Technically, you could have him arrested for non-compliance with a directive from a crew member. That's probably the textbook answer.

But how much you want to bother with it, it's up to you.
 
Ehh, perhaps a "COR" or something. Don't even ask me what it stands for. Perhaps one of the other Southerjetters can chime in.

Usually when we've had to have a smoker arrested for failing to cease, the station manager generally takes control and coordinates with the airport police.
 
Mr_Creepy said:
I'd ignore it.

They've yet to prove that laptops are dangerous anyway.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter, your average John Doe doesn't know any better.

If you are a deadheading pilot in uniform sitting next to this guy, tell him that "Did you know that the gamma rays from your laptop can interfere with the airplane's navigation receivers? While it doesn't matter during cruise, it is extremely critical during takeoff. You don't want anything BAD to happen to this flight, do you?"

I bet you 9/10 would put away the laptop and be scared the rest of the flight.
 
Yell "this guy is a terrorist" and enlist everyone on the plane to kick the living #### outta him.

Then take his laptop and wiz in it.
 
I'd ignore it.

They've yet to prove that laptops are dangerous anyway.
Click to expand...

The part that bothers me is that those people think they're so much smarter than everyone else. "Whatever, no one tells me what to do..." They said to turn your stuff off, so just do it. It sets a bad example to not enforce crew instructions.
 
When people would do crap like that on my flights (and yes, I've had this same scenario happen to me) I just get on the PA and keep repeating "again, please turn off all electronic devices". Repeat, over and over and over and over again while staring at the offending passenger. Eventually, everyone starts to look around to see why I'm repeating myself, and the offender gets embarassed and puts said laptop away. Works every time.

Electronic devices can interfere with aircraft systems. To what degree, and how many devices are needed to cause interference, who knows. Testing like that would require gads of time & money that no one wants to spend. Bottom line, it's a requirement that all electronics be turned off. So do it. You can survive without your precious lapotp on for a few minutes.

If said pax did refuse to comply, I'd tell the CA upon taxi-in, and have the cops meet the pax. Not necessarily to arrest or charge him (unless he was a real tool), but more to scare him and let him know that, yes, the rules apply to him too.
 
MQAAord said:
Electronic devices can interfere with aircraft systems.
Click to expand...
Mybusters busted that! And we all know if its' Myth BUSTED! it must be true!:sarcasm:

It is obvious MQA has done this FA thing, OH, a time or two;)
Definitely the best answer to me. If I was the Captain getting the call, I would be thinking "must be one of those junior FA's".
 
Cellphones when they go into 'search' mode or change towers can affect communications. There's this loud "budda bup BAAAAT budda bup BAAAT" over my headsets whenever one of the crew has their cellphone on at times.
 
Doug Taylor said:
Cellphones when they go into 'search' mode or change towers can affect communications. There's this loud "budda bup BAAAAT budda bup BAAAT" over my headsets whenever one of the crew has their cellphone on at times.
Click to expand...


Yeah, you always give that look to the Captain and vice versa to see who left their cell phone on. The funniest thing is when you are coming in to land and you get a voice mail message tone while out on final. "Crap, my bad."
 
Here is how a friend of mine (the FO in this story) handled a similar situation: Day four of four, last leg back to the base, last flight of the night, and someone won't turn her cell off on the ground. The FA finally gets her to shut it off, so off they all go. Out of sterile, the FA calls up front and advises that the offender placed a call as soon as the wheels were up and refused to comply with the FA's instructions to knock it off. So the FO hits the PA and advises everyone that the passenger in seat XX seems to have a very important phone conversation going on, and that they will be returning to the airport so she can conduct her business. And furthermore, everyone else gets to spend the night at the hub, since the crew will run out of duty time by the time the authorities get everything sorted out, and there are no later flights. Everyone can thank said passenger for the detour. Coincidentally, as the FO is hanging up, they get direct destination, which results in a sizable turn that, if one hadn't been paying attention, could be construed as a turn back toward the airport. That plus forty-nine sets of fiery staring eyes were enough to whip the person into shape post-haste.

...And everyone lived happily ever after. :)
 
I used to have my laptop on in the cockpit all the time. Never did a thing.

Nokia phones make a loud racket over headphones, but it's still possible to hear transmissions.

This myth about laptops causing a plane to "hardover" is just that - a myth.
 
Can you imagine if 1) people were allowed to use their cellphones in flight, and 2) technology improved so they would never lose their signal?
No thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top