Mike H
Well-Known Member
Technologically (or Technically) Advanced Aircraft, I mean.
It was always my understanding that for an airplane to be considered a Technologically (or Technically) Advanced Aircraft, it had to have three things: A IFR capable GPS, A moving map display, and an autopilot.
However, in my ASA CFI Oral Exam Guide, they define it as
So which is the right defininition? By ASA's definition, about 70% of my hours are in TAA's. By the other definition, it's about 38%
It was always my understanding that for an airplane to be considered a Technologically (or Technically) Advanced Aircraft, it had to have three things: A IFR capable GPS, A moving map display, and an autopilot.
However, in my ASA CFI Oral Exam Guide, they define it as
"A TAA is an aircraft that contains a GPS navigator with a moving map and any additional systems (italics mine) Many new TAAs have advanced engine management, integrated cockpit systems, and "glass cockpit" avionics (i.e. primary flight displays and mutifunctional displays) Typically, new TAAs also have a greater performance envelope (speed, range, altitude) than "legacy" aircraft
So which is the right defininition? By ASA's definition, about 70% of my hours are in TAA's. By the other definition, it's about 38%