[ QUOTE ]
Okay kids, not to burst your bubbles, but let's put this into perspective.
First off it's "Fossett" not "Faucet".
Second is this really a huge accomplishment? I mean Fossett didn't build his plane in his garage. It's a highly engineered aircraft designed for a specific trip, and it's basically a small jet engine with a small cockpit and a huge fuel tank.
It's got all the bells and whistles. I mean I doubt that this guy ever pulled out his sextant, like Lindbergh did to plot his course, and it's not like this hasn't been done before.
Sure he had less fuel than he thought, but his computer told him that. It most likely told him what his altitude and power setting changes he needed to make to make it. Maybe it would've been a little more impressive if he had done all those calculations on his slide rule. He also had a mission control setup, so it's not like he was alone and had to rely on his wits.
So basically it's an achievement for the engineers who designed his plane, but the only thing he achieved was to write a bunch of checks.
And here's a little nugget. The circumference of the Earth at the equator is about 24,859.82 miles. If he didn't go around the equator he didn't fly that whole distance.
Things like this do not impress me. What was the danger element of this? If he ran out of fuel, even if he was over water mission control would've had someone out to pick him up before it was a problem. If he was off course the computers would correct him, and if he lost his computers then mission control would've gotten him the course corrections. To me this thing was the same as having a Predator Drone doing this.
Send someone off in a modified C172 with minimal equipment and without a fully loaded mission control and I'll be impressed.
Naunga
[/ QUOTE ]yup, i agree... the only thing i'm impressed with is that he got clearance from all the countries he had to pass over and didn't have trouble with them once crossing into their airspace.