North American Airlines IS HIRING SOC Duty Manager

Nothin like working for what was a great airline just so your profits can be stolen by your sister airline and then lay off 50% of the workforce. No thanks.
 
Not very interested. The NAA folks are a wonderful bunch of people. The people running the holding company that owns them... not so much.
 
Not very interested. The NAA folks are a wonderful bunch of people. The people running the holding company that owns them... not so much.

Funny how things change in a few years, it was felt the opposite was happening immediately after the NAA purchase.

Ask the folks that use to work at ATA about that holding company

If there can be an award for bad business ideas of the last decade, the ATA holdings/ World Holdings/Global Aero should get it. But I suppose if it makes those in charge at the time millions then it was all good right?
 
Funny how things change in a few years, it was felt the opposite was happening immediately after the NAA purchase.

If there can be an award for bad business ideas of the last decade, the ATA holdings/ World Holdings/Global Aero should get it. But I suppose if it makes those in charge at the time millions then it was all good right?


The way I see and understand it, and I could be wrong, is that World Airways was doomed for not taking enough steps to ensure their future by getting newer aircraft and adapting to the capacity requests of the military. So they were screwed.

ATA was booted from the military contract team because FedEx didn't want them and bounced them out. The ATA debt is what finally killed GLAH's ability to function, even though North American had been profitable every year.


The big • group in this is MatlinPatterson, the hedge fund the owns the whole group. They are 0 for 6 for airlines. As with many hedge funds, they want to buy it and scrap it. None of the 3 airlines (ATA, NAA, World) had a chance.

IMO mergers and aquisitions are never good for the public as it reduces competition.

Competition, in this case, was not very relevant. It had nothing to do with why any of them failed, and the military business was dwindling anyway.
 
Back
Top