Logging PIC on IFR Training Flights

SkiHigh2002

New Member
A fellow CFI asked me a few days ago if I log flights on an IFR flight plan as PIC in a student's logbook. My answer was, "Of course, everything after the PPL (with the exception of ME training) is logged PIC." -- His stance is since the student is not legal to operate on an IFR flight plan then he is not legal to log PIC. I asked him if he does not log PIC for students wishing to get a complex signoff and he responded that its different since the complex is simply a signoff. I can completely see his point, but I have never heard this before. Any ideas from you all?
 
To be blunt, you're right, he's wrong.

Ask him to justify what he's saying with specific references to the regs.
 
Like JRH said, you are correct. I believe the FAR is 61.51. The instrument student can log pic because he is appropriately rated for the airplane. As long as all the work being done is in VFR conditions he can log the PIC. If you are in IMC, since he is not rated for it only you can log PIC.
I dont have an FAR handy but I believe that is the correct reg, anyone back me up or am I way off?
 
My answer was, "Of course, everything after the PPL (with the exception of ME training) is logged PIC."
While this is generally true, it is not a technically correct answer.
The answer is in FAR 61.51(e)(1)(i).

It is important to note that this regulation says, "Logging PIC time", not "Acting as PIC." The confusion comes from the idea that logging equals acting, when it does not, according to this reg.
 
The error being made by the other CFI is still pretty common, especially among those who (a) don't play in online forums and (b) perhaps ironically, who have enough real teaching experience to not have to go to an FIRC.

The FAA's arguably unfortunate and counter-intuitive use of "PIC" in two completely different contexts probably makes the distinction between "acting" and "logging" the single most confused requlatory issue to the uninitiated.

You can see it changing, though. There used to be a lot more online arguments about this question that the FAA resolved a long time ago.

Here, for your friend, the text of the almost 27-year old FAA Legal opinion on the subject (note that is specifically deals with your question) Note that the reg sub paragraph numbering has changed, but the substance of the text hasn't:

===========
OCT. 28, 1980

WINSTON SCOTT JONES

Dear Mr. Jones:

This is in response to your letter in which you request an interpretation of Section 61.51(2)(c) of the Federal Aviation Regulations, regarding logging of pilot-in-command (PIC) flight time.

Specifically, you ask what time may be logged as PIC time when the pilot in the right seat is a certificated flight instructor (CFI) along for the purpose of instruction and is not a required crewmember, and the pilot in the left seat holds either a private or commercial certificate in an aircraft for which he is rated.

Section 61.51 is a flight-time logging regulation, under which PIC time may be logged by one who is not actually the pilot in command (i.e., not "ultimately" responsible for the aircraft) during that time. This is consistent with the purpose of Section 61.51, which as stated in 61.51(a) is to record aeronautical training and experience used to meet the requirements for a certificate or rating, or the recent flight experience requirements of Section 61.

Section 61.51(c)(2)(i) provides that a private or commercial pilot may log as pilot-in-command time only that flight time during which the pilot--

1. Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he is rated; or

2. Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or

3. Acts as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft, or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.

Under Section 61.51(c)(2)(iii) a certificated flight instructor may log as pilot-in-command time all flight time during which he or she acts as a flight instructor. Sections 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide for logging of flight instruction and instrument flight instruction received.

Accordingly, two or more pilots may each log PIC time for the same flight time. For example, a pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he or she is rated may log that time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(i) while receiving instruction, and the instructor may log that same time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(iii).

There is no provision in the FAR's for logging of "dual" flight time; however, we assume that you are referring to logging time as instruction received. Section 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) allow flight instruction and instrument instruction received time to be recorded. There is nothing in the FAR's which prevents a pilot from logging the same time as both instruction received and PIC time, as long as each requirement is met. The pilot may also log the same time as instrument instruction. Note, though, that one hour of flight logged both as one hour of PIC and one hour of instruction received still adds up to only one hour total flight time.

You request interpretations of these regulations for situations in which:

1. The purpose of the flight is instruction in advanced maneuvers.

2. The purpose of the flight is simulated instrument instruction in actual VFR conditions.

3. The purpose of the flight is instrument instruction actual IFR conditions.

4. The pilot in the left seat is not current in the aircraft or in the conditions of flight.

5. The purpose of the flight is transition from tricycle to conventional landing gear.

6. The purpose of the flight is obtaining logbook endorsement authorizing operation of a high performance aircraft, as required by FAR 61.31(e).

7. The purpose of the flight is transition to a different type aircraft of the same category and class for which the left seat pilot is rated and a type rating is not required.

In each situation, the CFI may log PIC time for all flight time during which she or he acts as flight instructor. The pilot receiving instruction may also log PIC time in each of these situations, as the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which she or he is rated. Specifically, neither the currency requirements of situation 4 nor the log book endorsement of situation 6 are ratings within the meaning of Section 61.51. "Rating" as used in that section refers to the rating in categories, classes, and types, as listed in Section 61.5, which are placed on pilot certificates.

We trust that this discussion answers your questions.

Sincerely,

EDWARD P. FABERMAN
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
============
 
As long as all the work being done is in VFR conditions he can log the PIC. If you are in IMC, since he is not rated for it only you can log PIC.
I dont have an FAR handy but I believe that is the correct reg, anyone back me up or am I way off?

Actually, VFR or IMC has nothing to do with it.

Where the reg talks about being "rated" it strictly means category/class of aircraft...the "instrument" rating does not come into play.

The student is "rated" for the flight...he's controlling a single-engine land airplane, which is what his private pilot certificate lists for him. Any time he is sole manipulator of the controls, regardless of flight conditions (day/night, VFR/IFR), equipment (tailwheel, complex, high performance...), or type of flight (solo, dual received...), as long as it is a single-engine land airplane, he can log PIC.
 
As long as all the work being done is in VFR conditions he can log the PIC.
Nowhere in 61.51 does it say it must be in VMC. And if he's not legal in the clouds, he's not legal on any IFR fligth plan even in VMC, so its either all or nothing. Any time spent as the sole manipulator of the controls for an aircraft for which the pilot is rated or has privelages can be logged as PIC, even if the pilot is not completely qualified to act as PIC.
 
Actually, VFR or IMC has nothing to do with it.

So say I am an instrument student on an instrument flight with my instructor, we both log it as PIC UNTIL we encounter IMC. I would be able to log all the time up to the time we encounter IMC bc I am not instrument rated, therefore I would not be rated to fly in those conditions no matter what kind of airplane I am flying or rated to fly.

When I was instrument training, my instructor logged all of the time PIC for me until we would encounter IMC. Say the total flight was 2.5 and .5 of it was in IMC, i only log 2.0 as PIC since I was not an instrument pilot....
 
When I was instrument training, my instructor logged all of the time PIC for me until we would encounter IMC.

That's what is incorrect. You can log that time in the clouds as PIC, since you were the sole manipulator and rated in the aircraft.

Her error is *very* common. I've never met any instructor in real life who understood that logging PIC and being PIC are two different things.
 
I agree. You both are logging PIC when in IMC. The difference is that only the instructor can be acting PIC.
 
It is actually very simple

Any time a CFI is in the plane durring a training flight he "IS" the PIC, no matter what.

however,

Since the student is the sole manipulater of the controlls, he can LOG the time as PIC in his logbook. As long as he is rated in that catagory and class.
 
Actually, VFR or IMC has nothing to do with it.

Where the reg talks about being "rated" it strictly means category/class of aircraft...the "instrument" rating does not come into play.

The student is "rated" for the flight...he's controlling a single-engine land airplane, which is what his private pilot certificate lists for him. Any time he is sole manipulator of the controls, regardless of flight conditions (day/night, VFR/IFR), equipment (tailwheel, complex, high performance...), or type of flight (solo, dual received...), as long as it is a single-engine land airplane, he can log PIC.

OK, help me please, for the category/class of aircraft for PIC aren't clear to me. I'm a ASEL private pilot. I've now begun helicopter training with an instructor. I'm up to five hours dual time. Is PIC with dual still considered PIC as well?
 
OK, help me please, for the category/class of aircraft for PIC aren't clear to me. I'm a ASEL private pilot. I've now begun helicopter training with an instructor. I'm up to five hours dual time. Is PIC with dual still considered PIC as well?
You can not log PIC while training for the helicopter rating because you are not rated for that category and class. You log all your helicopter training just as you did as a student pilot going for the ASEL.
 
That sounds good to me. On logshare, I zero'd out PIC when I logged the dual time, but it gave me an error. I figured the program was smarter than I am. Hopefully, it won't take as long to PIC (solo) as it did with my private.

Judging from my flight today, who knows when I'll solo. Couldn't maintain a hover to save my soul. Phew! :(
 
It is actually very simple

Any time a CFI is in the plane durring a training flight he "IS" the PIC, no matter what.
That's not really accurate either.

Example: 70 year old instructor with no current flight review and who lost his medical 7 years ago giving training to a current qualified private pilot.

There's one where it's obvious the CFI isn't the PIC - the CFI in that one =can't= be the PIC - he's not qualified. And although there are indeed situations in which the CFI must also BE the PIC, it is not even close to universal. In many cases, who is PIC with a CFI giving training is subject to the same analysis of who is PIC whenever any two qualified pilots take to the air.
 
That's not really accurate either.

Example: 70 year old instructor with no current flight review and who lost his medical 7 years ago giving training to a current qualified private pilot.

There's one where it's obvious the CFI isn't the PIC - the CFI in that one =can't= be the PIC - he's not qualified. And although there are indeed situations in which the CFI must also BE the PIC, it is not even close to universal. In many cases, who is PIC with a CFI giving training is subject to the same analysis of who is PIC whenever any two qualified pilots take to the air.

:yeahthat:

The instructor that signed me off for my initial CFI checkride had lost his medical. When we flew together I was the only one who was legally able to act as PIC.
 
Like JRH said, you are correct. I believe the FAR is 61.51. The instrument student can log pic because he is appropriately rated for the airplane. As long as all the work being done is in VFR conditions he can log the PIC. If you are in IMC, since he is not rated for it only you can log PIC.
I dont have an FAR handy but I believe that is the correct reg, anyone back me up or am I way off?

Bzzz. Wrong. Explain how VFR has anything to do with IFR training. A non-instrument rated student can log PIC in IMC. The CFI can also log PIC (IMC) when in actual consitions as well.
 
Her error is *very* common. I've never met any instructor in real life who understood that logging PIC and being PIC are two different things.
I've met some. It's fortunately starting to become less common. CFIs who hang out online get to learn it since it a "dead horse" topic and, recognizing the difficulty caused by the FAA's decision to use "PIC" to refer to two completely difference concepts, FIRCs tend to cover it. But the rules of logging is still probably the regulatory area in which CFIs continue to have the most difficulty.
 
the rules of logging is still probably the regulatory area in which CFIs continue to have the most difficulty.
And will always ever continue to be until the FAA puts out a "special emphasis" alert to "PIC Logging" in the CFI PTS, which they won't. There are much more high-profile "safety emphasis areas" like runway incursions.
 
Back
Top