How bad would it be to leave a regional mid-training to go to another regional? From the perspective of getting hired at a major afterwards? Would it be better to finish training first THEN make the transition?
Cough cough, that one 74 operator. Seems to have worked out well.I'm not nor am I ever likely to be in the hiring department of any airline, but imho it would obviously be *better* to get through training before quitting. That said, I don't think it would be the kiss of death to bail now, but you'd definitely want to have a good story as to why it was the right thing to do and wasn't a "you can take the door or take the window" kind of situation.
I’m not following - seems to me he isn’t leaving until he already has an offer in hand(?). Easy enough to explain to a future major I would think…My big concern would be it would probably make it look like resignation in lieu of termination for training issues.
Shut up and color; can I get you another box of crayons?How about a 121 carrier that reverted back to paper charts from EFBs?
What @JordanD said isn't exactly an uncommon pattern, necessarily. RSN-in-lieu because you can't hack it is most assuredly a thing. (Back in the bad-old-days, I read enough "this is why I quit X Air in mid-training" explanatory letters accompanying resumes to be semi-suspicious of each one.)I’m not following - seems to me he isn’t leaving until he already has an offer in hand(?). Easy enough to explain to a future major I would think…
In this day and age, why would you quit one regional to go to another??? I know, I skipped that bullet point in my career, but I don't get it. Ride out the original regional if you have to for a while, and get picked up in the wave coming.
*My career is not normal, and I'm becoming the grumpy ass at MRDSCC lifer, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
Dude, no. Those 75-seat regionals suck. You need at least 76.I have zero experience, so take my answer with a grain of salt. But I'd definitely leave an all 50 seat jet fleet regional, for another regional that has 70-75 seat jets.
Mid training??? Yeah, Fiddy, that's a no from me, Dawg. I have no power to hire or fire, but that's a stupid reason to leave training.I have zero experience, so take my answer with a grain of salt. But I'd definitely leave an all 50 seat jet fleet regional, for another regional that has 70-75 seat jets.
I was thinking more down the road, although it probably would be fairly easy to explain as long as it was clear to the new place you wouldn’t do the same. I’m not totally against it though, if the new regional is one that will offer a better quality of life I wouldn’t fault someone for doing it. That would be way more important IMO if there is a significant difference in work/life balance.I’m not following - seems to me he isn’t leaving until he already has an offer in hand(?). Easy enough to explain to a future major I would think…
Lol... quitter.Cough cough, that one 74 operator. Seems to have worked out well.
Mid training??? Yeah, Fiddy, that's a no from me, Dawg. I have no power to hire or fire, but that's a stupid reason to leave training.![]()
You're going to need a bigger reason than that. And if that's the reason you're leaving you might have a difficult time going forward. Changes are constant, if you agree with half of them, congrats. Is the training subpar, do you have concerns of the financial stability of the company, are you worried about maintenance? These are all questions that could lead to a reason to leave.How about a 121 carrier that reverted back to paper charts from EFBs?
How about a 121 carrier that reverted back to paper charts from EFBs?
That actually happened?