Initial Commercial in a Multi Engine

todd405

Well-Known Member
Is anyone else doing initial commercial training in a multi engine airplane? If so, what is your take on the Part 61 requirements?

Reason is, the FAA called our school yesterday and said you need 30 hours of multi time not 20, so the people we have been signing off don't meet the Part 61 requirements...even though the examiners and IACRA don't catch this. They told us each student needs 20 hours of training in the areas of operation plus 10 hours solo.

Any input???
 
Check out 61.129(b)(4)
10 hours of solo flight time in a multiengine airplane or 10 hours of flight time performing the duties of pilot in command in a multiengine airplane with an authorized instructor

That 20hrs of training includes 10hrs of solo flight or flight performing PIC duties with an instructor on board.

A flight school owner explained to me that the school's insurance would not permit them to rent a twin to a customer with under 50hrs ME time. Perhaps the FAA is aware of situations like this and wrote the regs accordingly. I've found nothing in the FAR's that indicates a 30hr requirement. My input? Call the FAA back and ask them to quote you chapter and verse. Also ask them when this took effect. Btw, which FSDO contacted you?
 
That is how we read the regs as well and how we are doing the training. I just wondered if anyone else around the country is hearing this from the FAA. Oddly enough, we recently had the local FSDO audit our facility and got a good "report card" from them.
 
That is how we read the regs as well and how we are doing the training. I just wondered if anyone else around the country is hearing this from the FAA. Oddly enough, we recently had the local FSDO audit our facility and got a good "report card" from them.

Haven't heard any interpretations like that around here, but I can't remember the last time we had a multi-initial student, so I may not be in the loop. Next time I see our friendly, neighborhood Fed, I all ask him.
 
NO ONE is clear on this issue, because the whole reg is a crock anyways... We are dealing with a similar issue. Different FSDO inspectors have different answers.
 
That is how we read the regs as well and how we are doing the training. I just wondered if anyone else around the country is hearing this from the FAA. Oddly enough, we recently had the local FSDO audit our facility and got a good "report card" from them.

shouldnt they be after the examiners and IACRA? sounds odd that a part 61 flight school would get "audited" by the feds
 
The audit was actually our 141 inspection, I think that is an annual thing.

I just got word that the FAA has rejected our last 2 commercial certificates because they don't have enough time, citing they need 30 hours of multi engine time, (20 dual AND 10 PIC or 10 solo). You guys and gals might want to give your local FSDO a call and find out where they stand on this issue cause the Dallas FSDO now wants 30 hours!
 
I just got word that the FAA has rejected our last 2 commercial certificates because they don't have enough time, citing they need 30 hours of multi engine time, (20 dual AND 10 PIC or 10 solo).

You might want to clarify this. An initial candiate would need 20 hours of training time (in addition to the 10 as PIC), but only 10 of of those hours need to be in a ME aircraft.

FSDOs don't have the power to make their own rules on this. I'd carry it to OK city.
 
OK City is who rejected the 2 canidates and passed down this new interpretation of this regulation to our FSDO. So, our local DPE told me he will not test anyone that doesn't have 30 hours of multi time. I agree with MOJO6911, the reg is a crock.

Someone in OKC is definatly thinking too hard!
 
We do a handful of Multi initial commercials everyweek and have not been told anything about our students needing 30hours of Multi time.
 
Im currently doing my Multi-Engine and Commercial and for us the current requirements are found under:

61.129 (b) and 141 Appendix D
Best bet is if your doing this through a school talk to your chief pilot

I dont know our hours because we some of our requirements are lower for portions of the regs.

Call OK City. There isn't room for interpretation on this issue.
:yeahthat:
 
I'm completely flabbergasted by this thread! How could any flight school/ CFI-MEI possibly be confused on this issue, let alone any examiners or FSDOs? The requirements in the FARs are pretty simple to understand an initial commercial student whether single-engine or multi-engine needs a minimum of THIRTY (30) Hours of training for the initial commercial certificate. Twenty hours of dual instruction and ten hours of solo flight. The solo flight can be done with an instructor on board but still needs to be done as a "solo" with the student "performing the duties of a pilot in command."

The requirement for solo/PIC time in a multi-engine aircraft is a separate requirement from the 20 hours of dual training:

61.129(b) 250 Hours total flight time including at least:

61.129(b)(1) 100 hours in powered aircraft, 50+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(2) 100 hours PIC, 50+ in airplanes, and 50+ cross country, 10+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(3) 20 hours dual flight instruction,
61.129(b)(4) 10 hours solo flight or 10 hours performing the duties of a pilot-in-command with an authorized instructor on board.

The dual requirements and the solo requirements are two distinctly separate requirements. It is impossible, not to mention, completely ridiculous to infer that since the twenty hours of dual instruction were done with an instructor on board that the solo requirements were somehow completed. If that were the case the solo requirements would be completely superfluous and 61.129(b)(4) could simply be removed.

At a minimum, an initial COM-AMEL student would need a minimum of 25-30 hours of flight time in a multi-engine airplane because only 5 hours of the 10 hours of instrument instruction needs to be done in a multi-engine airplane, but it's still at least 20 hours of dual instruction and 10 hours of solo flight time for a total of 30 hours of which 25 hours has to be done in a multi-engine airplane.

To make it clearer imagine this scenario:

An instrument rated single-engine private pilot wishes to upgrade to an initial commercial multi-engine while concurrently obtaining a type-rating for a Learjet 45 which requires a crew of two pilots. The pilot completes a minimum of 20 hours of dual instruction (15 hours if the commercial instrument requirements were completed and logged for the instrument rating) in a Lear 45 while concurrently training for the type-rating. The pilot would also need to log 10 more hours of "solo" flight in the Lear "performing the duties of the pilot-in-command" while the instructor serves as the "second in command" since the Lear requires a crew of two.

It's this allowance in the FARs that allows flight schools to satisfy the insurance requirements by allowing the instructor to remain on board during the students "solo" flights even if it's a single-pilot airplane.
 
I'm completely flabbergasted by this thread! How could any flight school/ CFI-MEI possibly be confused on this issue, let alone any examiners or FSDOs? The requirements in the FARs are pretty simple to understand an initial commercial student whether single-engine or multi-engine needs a minimum of THIRTY (30) Hours of training for the initial commercial certificate. Twenty hours of dual instruction and ten hours of solo flight. The solo flight can be done with an instructor on board but still needs to be done as a "solo" with the student "performing the duties of a pilot in command."

The requirement for solo/PIC time in a multi-engine aircraft is a separate requirement from the 20 hours of dual training:

61.129(b) 250 Hours total flight time including at least:

61.129(b)(1) 100 hours in powered aircraft, 50+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(2) 100 hours PIC, 50+ in airplanes, and 50+ cross country, 10+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(3) 20 hours dual flight instruction,
61.129(b)(4) 10 hours solo flight or 10 hours performing the duties of a pilot-in-command with an authorized instructor on board.

The dual requirements and the solo requirements are two distinctly separate requirements. It is impossible, not to mention, completely ridiculous to infer that since the twenty hours of dual instruction were done with an instructor on board that the solo requirements were somehow completed. If that were the case the solo requirements would be completely superfluous and 61.129(b)(4) could simply be removed.

At a minimum, an initial COM-AMEL student would need a minimum of 25-30 hours of flight time in a multi-engine airplane because only 5 hours of the 10 hours of instrument instruction needs to be done in a multi-engine airplane, but it's still at least 20 hours of dual instruction and 10 hours of solo flight time for a total of 30 hours of which 25 hours has to be done in a multi-engine airplane.

To make it clearer imagine this scenario:

An instrument rated single-engine private pilot wishes to upgrade to an initial commercial multi-engine while concurrently obtaining a type-rating for a Learjet 45 which requires a crew of two pilots. The pilot completes a minimum of 20 hours of dual instruction (15 hours if the commercial instrument requirements were completed and logged for the instrument rating) in a Lear 45 while concurrently training for the type-rating. The pilot would also need to log 10 more hours of "solo" flight in the Lear "performing the duties of the pilot-in-command" while the instructor serves as the "second in command" since the Lear requires a crew of two.

It's this allowance in the FARs that allows flight schools to satisfy the insurance requirements by allowing the instructor to remain on board during the students "solo" flights even if it's a single-pilot airplane.
This thread was from 6 years ago, but you are wrong.
http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/commercial-multi-initial.176792/
 
Last edited:
61.129(b)(1) 100 hours in powered aircraft, 50+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(2) 100 hours PIC, 50+ in airplanes, and 50+ cross country, 10+ in airplanes,
61.129(b)(3) 20 hours dual flight instruction,
61.129(b)(4) 10 hours solo flight or 10 hours performing the duties of a pilot-in-command with an authorized instructor on board.

I'd say your reply just needs clarification.

You have to be careful with the regs. 61.129(b) actually states "20 hours of training". "Training" could be given in an FTD. 61.129(b)(4) is more specific and states "in a multiengine airplane."

There are some hours required under 61.129(b)(3) that pertain specially to the multiengine airplane, so make sure each is met. It is not the intent that 61.129(b)(3) and 61.129(b)(4) be combined when both are being flown with an instructor on board. The old FAQs explain it in detail.
 
Back
Top