Has anyone heard of this guy?

BCTAv8r

Well-Known Member
Had never heard of John Stringfellow before. Pretty interesting stuff for his time...


"John Stringfellow, who had grown up in the lace and carriage building industries, had a real appreciation for machines, and most especially for steam engines. He became intimately familiar with the oddities of steam powerplants and demonstrated a remarkable ability at designing and building light steam engines."

...

"Their first large model "ARIEL" failed to fly and they went on, over the course of almost two years, to construct a larger version with a 20 foot wing span. Between 1844 and 1847 Henson and Stringfellow made a series of attempts to fly their "ARIEL" models but they simply did not fly. In 1848 Henson left the enterprise and moved with his wife and family to the U.S., leaving Stringfellow to pursue aeronautical research on his own."

...

"The first result of Stringfellow's efforts was the 1848 machine shown below, which was powered by two contra-rotating propellers driven by one of Stringfellow's powerful and lightweight steam engines. The first attempt to fly the 10 foot wing span machine took place indoors, and a lack of proper balance resulted in a failure and damage to the machine. The second attempt was a rather wonderful success, for the flying machine left a guide wire and flew straight and true for about 30 feet."

... But unfortunately...

"John Stringfellow had planned to eventually build a flying machine which would carry him aloft, and equipped a building for just that purpose. Age and illness intervened, however, and that machine was not built."


http://www.flyingmachines.org/strng.html
 
No problem.

While we give a lot of credit to the Wright Brothers (not that they don't deserve it), there are a few individuals that made some contributions around that era (and before) that most people never hear about.

Here's another interesting bio:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Cayley
The Wright Brothers are overrated, especially since they are often considered "the first to fly." As we all know, that couldn't be further from the truth if you look at the Montgolfier Brothers' balloon from the late 1700s. Well, one might say, they were the first to fly a powered aircraft. But that's not the truth either. That honor belongs to a Frenchman Henri Giffard in 1852 with his steam powered airship. The Wright Brothers were most likely not even the first to fly a powered, heavier than air aircraft although that is debatable. Gustav Whitehead, Alberto Santos-Dumont, and others may have flown such ships as many as three years before the Wright Brothers.
 
The Wright Brothers are overrated, especially since they are often considered "the first to fly." As we all know, that couldn't be further from the truth if you look at the Montgolfier Brothers' balloon from the late 1700s. Well, one might say, they were the first to fly a powered aircraft. But that's not the truth either. That honor belongs to a Frenchman Henri Giffard in 1852 with his steam powered airship. The Wright Brothers were most likely not even the first to fly a powered, heavier than air aircraft although that is debatable. Gustav Whitehead, Alberto Santos-Dumont, and others may have flown such ships as many as three years before the Wright Brothers.


I wish more of the population knew and believed this tid bit of information. When I tell people about santos-dumont, people are like: NO IT WAS THE WRIGHT BROTHERS!

and clam up.
 
There is a really good expose of Santos-Dumont. I don't remember the name of the book--I read it about 10 yrs ago. I think it is a semi-biography of him. Look for the book and add it to your library.

The thing about the Wright Bros is that they were able to identify and then control the 3 axis of flight. As opposed to the notable S. Langley, the Wright's developed the perception that the propeller worked as an airfoil. That and much more is what lofted the Wrights to posterity. They truly were forward thinkers. This is contrary to Langley who basically took a giant step backwards in Lillienthall's work.

As far as the Wrights being overrated, I used to think somewhat along those lines. But such a perception is a product of our age whereas their achievements were such great advances for their age. Don't armchair quarterback the dedication, perseverance, and achievements of the Wrights. It can be debated that the Wrights stood on the shoulders of others but each aviator owes a great deal to the Wrights.
 
There is a really good expose of Santos-Dumont. I don't remember the name of the book--I read it about 10 yrs ago. I think it is a semi-biography of him. Look for the book and add it to your library.

The thing about the Wright Bros is that they were able to identify and then control the 3 axis of flight. As opposed to the notable S. Langley, the Wright's developed the perception that the propeller worked as an airfoil. That and much more is what lofted the Wrights to posterity. They truly were forward thinkers. This is contrary to Langley who basically took a giant step backwards in Lillienthall's work.

As far as the Wrights being overrated, I used to think somewhat along those lines. But such a perception is a product of our age whereas their achievements were such great advances for their age. Don't armchair quarterback the dedication, perseverance, and achievements of the Wrights. It can be debated that the Wrights stood on the shoulders of others but each aviator owes a great deal to the Wrights.
Maybe, but my point is all of the people who say that the Wrights "were the first to fly" when that couldn't be further from the truth. Plus Gustav Whitehead most likely made many similar discoveries before the Wright Brothers ever did. Quite possibly (although we will never known for certain), the only "first" the Wrights accomplished was first aviation promotional campaign.
 
Back
Top