Pilot Hopeful
Well-Known Member
I have noticed when ATC issues reroutes with full route clearances (e.g., weather avoidance) at airports having digital pre-departure clearance (PDC) service that the controllers generally resort to issuing the clearance verbally. This arrangement puzzles me because the time required to read multiple clearances greatly increases frequency congestion; it also increases the probability of pilot error in hearing, transcribing, or entering the amended routing. What is the rationale behind this solution? Although not all aircraft have PDC capabilities, it seems less-than-ideal to use the system only for routine "as filed" clearances. In fact, it would seem that the PDC system would be most beneficial for providing timely, accurate reroutes when the controller radio workload escalates.
One potential issue could be that ATC needs to verify that pilots have the correct clearance. If an amendment to is made after initial PDC retrieval, then ATC would need to ensure the new routing makes it to the pilots prior to takeoff. Even so, a simple verification protocol between a local controller and pilots before departure need not be as time consuming and cumbersome as the current one.
One potential issue could be that ATC needs to verify that pilots have the correct clearance. If an amendment to is made after initial PDC retrieval, then ATC would need to ensure the new routing makes it to the pilots prior to takeoff. Even so, a simple verification protocol between a local controller and pilots before departure need not be as time consuming and cumbersome as the current one.