ExpressJet Posts 31.7 Million dollar Q4 LOSS!!!

100LLguy

New Member
ExpressJet Holdings Inc. (XJT: XJT swung to a fourth-quarter loss of $31.7 million, or 60 cents a share, from a profit of $22.8 million, or 39 cents a share, a year earlier. The Houston regional airline said that excluding special charges, it posted a loss of $27.6 million, or 52 cents a share, in the latest quarter. Revenue rose 2.3% to $436 million from $426.4 million. The company expects 2008 capital expenditures of $15 million to $20 million.

70.2 million dollar loss for 2007. The losses have further increased for XJT, not reduced.....

There's one reason for the COLA's.....next step.......?

Good luck guys
 
Does anyone know what the loss/profit business plan was for branded? I would of expected a loss the first few quarters just in branded as they got operations up and running, as well as fine tuning.
 
Well, it doesn't say "branded"...and you have to figure branded together with the subbing out portions to the various legacys. it would be good to know what portion of that loss IS branded however.
 
Wow...there sure are a ton of people trying to dogpile XJT or EXJ or whatever the stupid 2 or 3 letter ID is for Expressjet, dba, Aquafresh Express :p.

I wish all you guys the best. At least your company is doing things the right way, and not underbidding people to get more flying,etc. Put up a good fight guys and gals!!!
 
I wish all you guys the best. At least your company is doing things the right way, and not underbidding people to get more flying,etc. Put up a good fight guys and gals!!!


The good fight all the way up until furloughs, a buyout, branded shutting down or CH 11.....one of these will happen.....look more for the buyout
 
The good fight all the way up until furloughs, a buyout, branded shutting down or CH 11.....one of these will happen.....look more for the buyout

Buyout? What does the company own besides a paint shop and MX outsourcing services? Can't their agreement with CAL be terminated with 12 months notice? They don't even own the leases to the unprofitable 50 seaters.
 
Yeah, maybe a nice roundtrip to Ontario and back.

I can get my drink on with those $1 beers.

Support XJET, folks. Watching on the best labor-friendly companies out there tank only spells bad things for the others that aren't stabbing labor in the back.
 
Whatever happens, it wont be a "FlyI redux". Atlantic Coast Airlines would not have turned a profit, if it continued to operate in the UAX system for the rate reductions bankrupt United Airlines wanted. United chose cheap over quality (no big surprise), when Atlantic Coast management refused to lower their rates. ACA looked for another partner, but the result would have been the same. The company, and employees, went ahead with the plan of creating Washington Dulles Airport's only hometown Low Cost Carrier, while fighting off an aggressive hostile takeover attempt by Jonathan Ornstein and MESA Air Group.

That being said, 6 months later we had no mainline partner and had successfully transformed the entire airline into a LCC. It was a big gamble, the company entered the LCC market with 88 CRJs and the addition of A319 jets soon thereafter. With so many airplanes to fly, there were up to 14 flights a day to many of our destinations. The load factor for a "start-up" airline just didn't support the operating cost, especially due to immediate fare cuts by United, AirTran, Northwest, etc. on matching routes. Some of those carriers had pockets deep enough to sustain massive operating losses over a long-term period. High operating cost of the CRJ-200s and the rising cost of fuel were factors, as well. In the end, the result was bankruptcy and liquidation. However, it is a much different story than what is happening at XJT.

Good luck to the ExpressJet pilots, by the way. Like Independence, your company tried to take what's screwed up about this business and do something about it by offering a superior product at a competitive price. There are definitely some similarities, but there are way too many differences to call it a "redux".
 
Back
Top