dustoff17
Still trying to reach the Top Shelf
@NovemberEcho, I want to ask a few questions but thought it best to come here rather than cloud the Atlas accident thread.
The job you all do is impressive. I am still in amazement of how you are able to thread the needle with the thousands of aircraft that pass in a day. That having been stated, there are some situations that can't be handled with a simple, "Sorry, I can't let you do that..."
This has come in to play a few times over the last year. Last Jul, I had a Forward Baggage Compartment FIRE indication while at FL310 flying north out of FL. I declared an emergency, advised I was descending and told JAX I was flying direct to KJAX. The controller acknowledged then came back a few seconds later and told me to "level off at 17,000 due to northbound departure out of Miami" Ummm...….NO!
I told him "unable".
"Your unable to level off?"
"OK, let me rephrase, UNWILLING. I have a potential fire here, if there's a conflict, move the Miami outbound traffic!"
"Umm...….OK, can you fly a vector?"
"Sure, as long as that vector is keeping me on my current heading, direct to JAX"
"Umm...….standby"
15 sec...….
Different voice "N** continue"
"Roger"
THEN about two months later while flying into Wichita, IND Center told me to descend from 430 to 240. [There was a HUGE line of thunderstorms crossing my path]
I said, "Request discretion on that descent due to this line of thunderstorms at my 12. If I can stay high until I get past this, I'll accept a slam-dunk on the other side."
"No, I have to bring you down now. Descend and maintain FL240"
"Roger, departing 430 descending 240" [I gave him a solid 500fpm rate and started down]
He starts this tirade about a "Letter of Agreement with Kansas City.....blah, blah, blah and I need to give him at least 3,000fpm"
"Unable due to the large storm at my 12"
"Our Letter of Agreement is that you will be at a certain altitude at a certain point....."
"Your agreement was written with consideration of a perfect day in a perfect world by people sitting at a desk and NOT by a pilot facing a storm this size. If I need to declare an emergency in order to absolve you of something written on a stupid piece of paper please advise" "I can take a SW heading for 100 miles to fly around this thing if that works for you"
"Disregard, contact KC...."
KC "Descent is your discretion. Descend and maintain 15,000 when able"
I just don't understand situations like this. It is my hope that nothing about the Atlas request and subsequent denial comes into play here. That would be reminiscent of the ATL incident years ago.
I'm positive there are just as many stories of non-cooperation by pilots. Probably more than the other way around. Thanks for your input here......
I understand what your stating here but when you write, "Even during an emergency I’m not going to let you occupy the same space another plane currently is, and if you choose to do it on your own you’ll be putting a lot more lives at risk.", I have to ask how you will be able to stop the turn that I HAVE to take in order to avoid a serious storm in front of me? If I have declared an emergency and turn towards "the same space another plane currently is", then wouldn't you move the non-emergency aircraft?That’s when you turn around. If I said you can’t go there cause of departures, it means there’s already planes in the hole and in this case probably opposite direction. If you don’t have an option in front, left or right of you, then the way you came is the option. Even during an emergency I’m not going to let you occupy the same space another plane currently is, and if you choose to do it on your own you’ll be putting a lot more lives at risk. It takes time to coordinate stopping departures and clearing the way when the airspace becomes as narrowed and cluttered as it does during a weather day.
The job you all do is impressive. I am still in amazement of how you are able to thread the needle with the thousands of aircraft that pass in a day. That having been stated, there are some situations that can't be handled with a simple, "Sorry, I can't let you do that..."
This has come in to play a few times over the last year. Last Jul, I had a Forward Baggage Compartment FIRE indication while at FL310 flying north out of FL. I declared an emergency, advised I was descending and told JAX I was flying direct to KJAX. The controller acknowledged then came back a few seconds later and told me to "level off at 17,000 due to northbound departure out of Miami" Ummm...….NO!
I told him "unable".
"Your unable to level off?"
"OK, let me rephrase, UNWILLING. I have a potential fire here, if there's a conflict, move the Miami outbound traffic!"
"Umm...….OK, can you fly a vector?"
"Sure, as long as that vector is keeping me on my current heading, direct to JAX"
"Umm...….standby"
15 sec...….
Different voice "N** continue"
"Roger"
THEN about two months later while flying into Wichita, IND Center told me to descend from 430 to 240. [There was a HUGE line of thunderstorms crossing my path]
I said, "Request discretion on that descent due to this line of thunderstorms at my 12. If I can stay high until I get past this, I'll accept a slam-dunk on the other side."
"No, I have to bring you down now. Descend and maintain FL240"
"Roger, departing 430 descending 240" [I gave him a solid 500fpm rate and started down]
He starts this tirade about a "Letter of Agreement with Kansas City.....blah, blah, blah and I need to give him at least 3,000fpm"
"Unable due to the large storm at my 12"
"Our Letter of Agreement is that you will be at a certain altitude at a certain point....."
"Your agreement was written with consideration of a perfect day in a perfect world by people sitting at a desk and NOT by a pilot facing a storm this size. If I need to declare an emergency in order to absolve you of something written on a stupid piece of paper please advise" "I can take a SW heading for 100 miles to fly around this thing if that works for you"
"Disregard, contact KC...."
KC "Descent is your discretion. Descend and maintain 15,000 when able"
I just don't understand situations like this. It is my hope that nothing about the Atlas request and subsequent denial comes into play here. That would be reminiscent of the ATL incident years ago.
I'm positive there are just as many stories of non-cooperation by pilots. Probably more than the other way around. Thanks for your input here......