CFII count as IPC?

CoffeeIcePapers

Well-Hung Member
I haven't had an IPC since 10/2003, so obviously, I haven't flown real IFR since then. I am pretty much prepping myself to take the CFII checkride, and will ultimately get another instructor to sign me off to take the practical. Does the CFII count as an IPC the way it would count towards the flight review currency, or would I have to get my instructor or the DE to sign me off as an IPC as well?
 
I haven't had an IPC since 10/2003, so obviously, I haven't flown real IFR since then. I am pretty much prepping myself to take the CFII checkride, and will ultimately get another instructor to sign me off to take the practical. Does the CFII count as an IPC the way it would count towards the flight review currency, or would I have to get my instructor or the DE to sign me off as an IPC as well?

There is no provision in the regs to allow a checkride for anything to count for an IPC. Your best bet is to get your instructor to sign you off for an IPC, but, since no instruction is required for an IPC, the examiner would probably be willing to do so (unlike a flight review.)

Note too, that that a -II checkride does not count towards a flight review. Section 61.56(d) reads as follows:
A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.

The reg says a checkride for pilot certificate, rating, etc. A flight instructor certificate is not a pilot certificate....it's a flight instructor certificate.
 
Good catch on the flight review portion. Thanks a lot.

Be advised that almost no one is aware of that distinction. Most people operate under the impression that it *does* count, including examiners.

The FAQ's offered a bizarre interpretation. They said it did count but to make sure you got credit for it, ask the examiner to sign you off for a flight review.

Is that logical? If it does count, then you don't need an examiner to sign you off for anything. If it doesn't count, then an examiner won't be able to sign you off for a Flight Review, since that requires at least an hour of ground and hour of flight training, which an examiner is not permitted to give.

Anyway, to me the reg is pretty clear, and it remains in force no matter what any examiner says. When I was going through the instructor ratings, I always made sure to get a flight review.
 
In my opinion it counts as a BFR if you want it to. It's just an understood and doesn't need an endorsement. Why not just count your CFII as an IPC as well. Everyone thinks they know the answers and that everything is black and white, BUT IT IS NOT. Just make up your own mind and stick to that. Who cares what another guys interpretation is on the matter. You can't rely on every Joe to tell you the truth. Maybe you should call the FSDO and find out. Don't be afraid...
 
In my opinion it counts as a BFR if you want it to. It's just an understood and doesn't need an endorsement. Why not just count your CFII as an IPC as well. Everyone thinks they know the answers and that everything is black and white, BUT IT IS NOT. Just make up your own mind and stick to that. Who cares what another guys interpretation is on the matter. You can't rely on every Joe to tell you the truth. Maybe you should call the FSDO and find out. Don't be afraid...
True. You can call you local FSDO and have them say "sure, it's okay," and then get you logbook checked in connection with something else and have lack of a current FR tacked onto the rest of the violations. Knowledge is one thing; what you choose to do with it is your business.

No, this one is not black and white - there's been a lot of controversy about it. This isn't on my web site yet, but, for educational purposes only, it is the beginnings of a FAQ on the FR question.

***************************
The answer to this frequently asked question is "No. Earning a CFI certificate or rating does not automatically count as a BFR" Unfortunately, if you ask around, you'll find FSDOs going every which way on it.

There are specifics, but the "paradigm" reason is that the FAA treats "pilot certificates" and "operating privileges" differently than "instructor certificates" and "instructing privileges".

61.56(d) talks about a "=pilot= proficiency check ... for a =pilot= certificate, rating, or operating privilege...." A CFI certificate is not a pilot certificate and the privilege of teaching others is not an operating privilege.

If you're still interested, here's some filler:

From a pure regulation standpoint, the FAR treats instructor certificates separately from pilot certificates. Staring with

==============================
§ 61.1 Applicability and definitions.
(a) This part prescribes:
(1) The requirements for issuing =pilot, flight instructor, and ground instructor certificates= and ratings; the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary; and the privileges and limitations of those certificates and ratings.
(2) The requirements for issuing =pilot, flight instructor, and ground instructor= authorizations; the conditions under which those authorizations are necessary; and the privileges and limitations of those authorizations.
(3) The requirements for issuing =pilot, flight instructor, and ground instructor= certificates and ratings for persons who have taken courses approved by the Administrator under other parts of this chapter.
==============================

The differentiation continues throughout the FAR and general FAA policy with amazing consistency, from medical certificate requirements (a CFI doesn't need one unless he's also acting as PIC) to the requirement to have each certificate available when exercising that certificate's privileges to the requirement that, in order to teach in an aircraft, a CFI must have both "A pilot certificate =and= flight instructor certificate with the applicable category and class rating" (61.195(b)(1). One may exist, but it would be hard to find an FAR that =does= treat the flight instructor certificate as a pilot certificate.

On the other hand, it's not surprising that FSDOs are all over the place. Lynch really screwed up the Part 61 FAQ on this one. It ends up saying, yes it counts, so long as it covers the tasks and you get the FR endorsement, which can be said for complex transition training also or a simple checkout also. A lot of people read the "yes it counts" part and stop.

It would be nice to have a final, solid, official answer to this one. Better to have everyone do it the same way, even if it's "wrong" than get have an incident or accident and have a pilot's currency determined by which part of the US it happened in.

For now, all we have is the FAQ, an FAA Eastern Region legal counsel opinion, and FSDOs going every which way.

FYI, here are the FAQ and the legal opinion:

=FAQ==========================
QUESTION: The particular question is whether a flight instructor who passes a flight instructor practical test (for initial issuance or a CFI rating addition or for a reinstatement) is or is not exempt from needing a § 61.56 Flight Review for the next two years, since the reg. specifically says PILOT proficiency check.” § 6l.56 d - allows this exemption for a person who has"... passed a PILOT proficiency check.." not needing to accomplish a flight review for the next 2 years.

ANSWER: Ref. § 61.56(d); If the examiner also evaluates the applicant's piloting skills then YES, “. . . a flight instructor practical test (for initial issuance or a CFI rating addition or for a reinstatement) . . .” would meet the requirements of a § 61.56 Flight Review. However, to make sure the applicant gets credit for successful completion of the Flight Review, the examiner should record that the § 61.56 Flight Review was satisfactorily completed in the applicant's logbook.
==============================

==Legal Opinion==================
1 Aviation Plaza
Room 561
Jamaica, NY 11434

RE: Interpretation of FAR 61.56(d)

Dear Mr. Dennstaedt:

This is in response to your letter dated August 25, 2001, wherein you ask whether an airman can satisfy the flight review requirement under 14 C.F.R. (Federal Aviation Regulation [FAR]) 61.56 by passing a practical test to become a certified flight instructor (CFI), as required by FAR 61.183.

Under FAR 61.56(c)(1), one may not act as pilot-in-command of an aircraft unless, within the preceding 24 calendar months, he has "accomplished a flight review given in an aircraft for which that pilot is rated by an authorized instructor." Under FAR 61.56(c)(2), the airman must receive a logbook endorsement from the authorized instructor certifying that he has satisfactorily completed the review. Under FAR 61.56(a), a flight review must include: (1) a review of the current general operating and flight rules of Part 91; and (2) a review of those maneuvers and procedures that, at the discretion of the person giving the review, are necessary for the pilot to demonstrate the safe exercise of the privileges of the pilot certificate.

Under FAR 61.56(d), however, the flight review requirement of FAR 61.56(c)(1) does not apply to one who has "passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate rating, or operating privilege."

The issue you raise is whether passing a practical test to become a CFI can fall within the exception to the flight review requirement that is provided by FAR 61.56(d). Under FAR 183(h), to be eligible for a flight instructor certificate or rating, the applicant must "pass the required practical test that is appropriate to the flight instructor rating sought." The FAA Practical Test Standards (PTS) for the airplane flight instructor examiner (sic) requires that the examiner ensure that the flight instructor applicant has the "ability to perform the procedures and maneuvers included in the standards to at least the commercial pilot skill level."

Thus, the instructor has broad discretion in conducting a flight review. A CFI practical test encompasses the demonstration of various basic maneuvers that an instructor is likely to cover in a flight review. Incorporating a flight review into the CFI practical test could be accomplished, therefore, with little, if any difficulty.

Accordingly, a CFI practical test will not per se fulfill the flight review requirement. A practical test for a CFI rating under FAR 61.183, taken within 24 months of a prior flight review, can readily meet the flight review requirement of FAR 61.56(d), however, if the examiner is satisfied that a flight review endorsement can be given. To ensure that the CFI applicant gets credit for successful completion of the flight review, however, he or she should ask the examiner to conduct the CFI oral and practical test so as to satisfy the flight review requirements as well, and to make a logbook endorsement for the flight review upon completion of the examination.

If you have additional inquiries, please contact Zachary M. Berman of this office at (718) 553-3258.

Sincerely,


Loretta E. Alkalay

(FAA Regional Counsel, Eastern Region)
==============================
 
In my opinion it counts as a BFR if you want it to. It's just an understood and doesn't need an endorsement. Why not just count your CFII as an IPC as well. Everyone thinks they know the answers and that everything is black and white, BUT IT IS NOT. Just make up your own mind and stick to that. Who cares what another guys interpretation is on the matter. You can't rely on every Joe to tell you the truth. Maybe you should call the FSDO and find out. Don't be afraid...


Er.....I'm assuming this post is a joke?
 
No, this one is not black and white - there's been a lot of controversy about it. This isn't on my web site yet, but, for educational purposes only, it is the beginnings of a FAQ on the FR question.

The hangar crowd at my flight school is trying to say that a Flight Instructor Certificate is an "operating privilege", according to one my CFI students.

I can't disprove that, since the FAA has never defined "operating privilege", but seeing how "operating privilege" is used makes it seem very unlikely that a flight instructor certificate could be one.

People will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics in order to demonstrate the law of primacy.:)

In my view, however, this situation is black-and-white. No matter what any FSDO says, or the General Counsel says, the law reads the way the law reads. If they want a Flight Instructor checkride to count as a flight review, then they need to rewrite the regulation.
 
MidlifeFlyer just quoted the source for the comment I made about the FAQ saying that "Yes, it counts but better get a Flight Review signoff."

The meaning of that is, "No, it doesn't count." :)

It just occurred to me that what the FAQ and Legal Opinion are saying is that the checkride is adequate to cover the *content* of a Flight Review, which is what they mean by saying that it does count.

However, by saying that you must get a Flight Review signoff, they're agreeing that having the checkride in your logbook is not sufficient to count for a Flight Review.
 
Hmmm... I just got my CFII and the examiner told me that it counted as an IPC (even though he didn't give me an IPC endorsement).
 
Hmmm... I just got my CFII and the examiner told me that it counted as an IPC (even though he didn't give me an IPC endorsement).

People that offer interpretations of the regulations without actually looking at them often screw up.;) Most of the time, it reads differently from the way we remember. Look at the regulation and see if it supports his point of view.
 
It just occurred to me that what the FAQ and Legal Opinion are saying is that the checkride is adequate to cover the *content* of a Flight Review, which is what they mean by saying that it does count.

However, by saying that you must get a Flight Review signoff, they're agreeing that having the checkride in your logbook is not sufficient to count for a Flight Review.

This was what I thought it was. It covers it, but you will still need the logbook entry specifically for the IPC.

:shrug:
 
For what it's worth, when I went for my initial CFI ride with a DPE, he made it very clear that the checkride does *not* count as a flight review.

He said technically a person could go through an entire instructor checkride without ever touching the countrols. They really only need to talk their way through the manuevers while the examiner flies, in order to meet the minimum standards of the PTS. An instructor checkride doesn't require the applicant to demonsrate good airmanship necessarily. The checkride is designed to evaluate how good of a teacher somebody is, not how good of a pilot they are.

That explanation made perfect sense to me and I believe it all applies to the CFII checkride as well.

Just my $0.02.
 
People that offer interpretations of the regulations without actually looking at them often screw up.;) Most of the time, it reads differently from the way we remember. Look at the regulation and see if it supports his point of view.



If I've learned anything about aviation, THAT's it. I finally caught on when I would ask 5 people the same reg question and get five different answers. Unfortunately "so-and-so told me it was this" doesn't cut it in the court room.
 
It just occurred to me that what the FAQ and Legal Opinion are saying is that the checkride is adequate to cover the *content* of a Flight Review, which is what they mean by saying that it does count.

However, by saying that you must get a Flight Review signoff, they're agreeing that having the checkride in your logbook is not sufficient to count for a Flight Review.
Our opinions of what it says and what it means are identical.

And that it does not automatically count is getting filtered through the ranks - slowly - but getting there.

But I will take issue with "black and white." You and I can look at the words and say it's clear; someone else will also say it's clear - in the opposite way. Take the old commercial AMEL/CFI-ASE teaching instruments in a multi. The FAR "clearly" says you have to have a CFI rating for an aircraft you teach in. Noting in the FAR wording says "except for instruments." Even some of those "clear if you read the" logging rules. FAR 61.51 does =not= really say you may log PIC in an aircraft in which you are not endorsed yet we know from a long line of consistent interpretations that this is what it means. A flight with a hooded pilot and a safety pilot is =not= a 2-pilot-required operation, yet years of FAA interpretation of its own regulation say that it is.


Ultimately the FAA decides what the FAR means.
 
Back
Top