Violates, not violated.
Or get a violation, I suppose, unless this is an idiom among pilots. I mean the Feds to like to rape people when they can. Bad jokes aside and being no lawyer or pilot, my guess is it depends on what the FAA thinks. Should he? If he didn't know at all, then no. And I would think that is how the law works, though someone can correct me. It sort of sucks for the innocent if it doesn't work that. way. I am assuming the FO did not neglect anything, but did everything in good faith and to the book. But to use the language where everything sounds profound,
innocentes nocentibus satisfacere debet puniri administrationem. [The innocent must be punished to satisfy bureaucrats]