Beeman's Gum - What is it?

gurisudenko

New Member
Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

I just got out of my aeronautics class, and my teacher mentioned that he found Beeman's gum at the World Market, and that he hadn't seen it anywhere for about 35 years. Supposedly, Beeman's Gum has some sort of application or significance to aviation. He won't tell us!!

What is it? I'm looking around and found it has no artificial sweeteners or sorbitol...does that mean anything?

HELP!
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

spin2.gif
cmon 10 points...cmon!!!

Now...anyone know how to make a paper airplane that will fly straight into a wall 35 feet ahead of me?

My teacher is awesome.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

I heard that Chuck Yeager chewed a piece of Beeman's gum during flight to fight dry mouth from breathing the O2.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

rawk.gif


Does an absence of artificial sweeteners or sorbitol have anything to do with it staving off dry mouth?
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
spin2.gif
cmon 10 points...cmon!!!

Now...anyone know how to make a paper airplane that will fly straight into a wall 35 feet ahead of me?

My teacher is awesome.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cris

If thrown correctly, those 777 gliders that you got at the Vegas event could certainly do that..... HA!
grin.gif
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

Hey, Ridley, you got any Beeman's?

Yeah, I think I got me a stick.

Loan me some, will you? I'll pay you back later.

Fair enough.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

Cristl, come one! I know you've seen The Right Stuff. If not, rent it. It's worth it. In fact, it's only like $15-20 on DVD. Buy it. Plenty of Beeman's references (like the one above) in there.
smile.gif
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
Cristl, come one! I know you've seen The Right Stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kell, c'mon, she wasn't even born when it was made.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

Hey, even I understood that reference. And Meijer sells Beemans as well. I've made many a trip there for it. They have a display near the registers that is "old time" candy and it is one of the things on it. Ok, that is admitting more than enough dorkiness for one post.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
Kell, c'mon, she wasn't even born when it was made.

[/ QUOTE ]

And your point? Casablanca is my favorite movie, and it pre-dates me by over 30 years.
smile.gif
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Kell, c'mon, she wasn't even born when it was made.

[/ QUOTE ]

And your point? Casablanca is my favorite movie, and it pre-dates me by over 30 years.
smile.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

My point is simple, oh young padawan. The kids of today don't seem to have the nostalgia some of us older types do. If it ain't "The Matrix", they don't care to see it.

You're a rare exception.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
The kids of today don't seem to have the nostalgia some of us older types do. If it ain't "The Matrix", they don't care to see it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sadly, that's very true. I was watching the re-make of Texas Chainsaw Massacre the other night, and I was noticing how dumbed down it was. The original was subtle and let you fill in the terror with your own immagination. Audiences now need to be clubbed over the head for it to sink in, otherwise it "sucked" or was "weak." In the 1930s people were terrified of a rubber bat flapping on the screen (Dracula 1931), but now if they don't actually SEE the person being mutliated, it's not "scary."

Wow, nice tangent, Kel......
smile.gif
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The kids of today don't seem to have the nostalgia some of us older types do. If it ain't "The Matrix", they don't care to see it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sadly, that's very true. I was watching the re-make of Texas Chainsaw Massacre the other night, and I was noticing how dumbed down it was. The original was subtle and let you fill in the terror with your own immagination. Audiences now need to be clubbed over the head for it to sink in, otherwise it "sucked" or was "weak." In the 1930s people were terrified of a rubber bat flapping on the screen (Dracula 1931), but now if they don't actually SEE the person being mutliated, it's not "scary."

Wow, nice tangent, Kel......
smile.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

You're absolutely right. People of today don't appreciate real movie stunts versus digital enhancing that makes anything possible. Like in Airport 1975....cheezy movie, but the helo flying ahead of the 747 and really lowering a guy to the fuselage in midair (prior to cutting to the cockpit mock-up where the real hole in the fuselage is), but that stunt was real and dangerous. Not many people of today seemingly appreciate that kind of effort.

.....end of rant.
grin.gif
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

Yay! I got the extra credit points! Thanks, guys.
laugh.gif


"Where did you find your information, Cristl?"
"Jetcareers.com forums"
grin.gif


Today in Aeronautics class my instructor showed us "The Right Stuff" info at Amazon.com. He's encouraging us to go out and buy/rent it. I'm not sure if I've ever seen parts of it before, but I definitely have to check that one out.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]

You're absolutely right. People of today don't appreciate real movie stunts versus digital enhancing that makes anything possible. Like in Airport 1975....cheezy movie, but the helo flying ahead of the 747 and really lowering a guy to the fuselage in midair (prior to cutting to the cockpit mock-up where the real hole in the fuselage is), but that stunt was real and dangerous. Not many people of today seemingly appreciate that kind of effort.

[/ QUOTE ]

Or how about the original Flight of the Phoenix, where Paul Mantz was killed flying a "homebuilt" Phoenix.

http://stripe.colorado.edu/~steinerd/Phoenix.html

And maybe the greatest aviation stunt of all time was Cliffhanger:

CLIFFHANGER (1993)
A thief defies the friendly skies with an airborne plane-to-plane transfer.
Assignment: Exit the tail of a DC-9 at 15,000 feet and slide down to the open door of a smaller JetStar getaway plane, clinging to a wind-buffeted connecting rope that might whip you into the clouds—or a jet engine. In an age of digital fakery, this high-altitude feat earns its wings as the greatest one-man aerial stunt in modern movies.
How it went down: A prime example of how the best-planned stunt can encounter the unforeseen. During one rehearsal, flying at 140 knots (any slower and the engines could have stalled), stunt coordinator and aerial stunt expert Simon Crane was winched out from the tail of the DC-9, briefly hit a patch of dead air, and was twice slammed into the plane’s tail, forcing him to release from the rope and deploy his parachute. For the actual filming of the stunt high over the Rocky Mountains, that part went off as planned, but when he neared the JetStar, the weighted end of the rope looped around its wing, hindering Crane’s ability to hook up with the rescue winch being manned by someone inside the smaller plane. Suspended midair for more than a minute, Crane was growing fatigued in the subzero wind when the pilot chose to steer the plane toward him. Miraculously, Crane made it inside the hatch, getting the all-important shot, but was immediately yanked back outside. As the crew listened to him sliding along the top of the plane, he released, missed being sucked into the roaring engine by about six feet, and blew over the tail into the wild blue yonder. He parachuted down and was picked up by a helicopter—his balls approximately 84 percent bigger than before the stunt.
 
Re: Beeman\'s Gum - What is it?

[ QUOTE ]
flying at 140 knots (any slower and the engines could have stalled),

[/ QUOTE ]

banghead.gif
 
Back
Top