The whole magazine itself is crap anyway! I read through some of the airline profiles and some of the facts and figures were way off.
Please provide an example.
I'm from southern California.My point is that they look like idiots. In the flight deck is one thing but sunglasses and the hat don't mix. Pilots that look like tools make us all look bad and this crew fit the description.
I'm from southern California.
Sunglasses and hat are permissible, but only if it's sunny.
Not as cool as the sweet ass leather jacket. "I like that I can wear it when we go out." Guys it's not a cool look on the overnight.At the same time? Oh geez, next you're going to tell me you bought an epaulet sweater!
Please provide an example.
OT
Hey Doug, guess you passed too? Made it out of there by 9, and already home. Got handed a honey do walking in the door! Was great seeing ya again. Have a safe trip.
Now back to Fabulous Pilot Fashionz!
/OT
I already threw it in the trash, but I remember under the Comair profile it said 1,100 active pilots, which isn't even close to the actual number. There are about 685 active and there aren't 150 on furlough either. I also don't understand why they didn't combine the ASA/XJT profile and there was some other minor stuff, like ASA only flying within the USA.
After the whole Tim Martins article the whole magazine lost all credibility for me.
But then we're in an industry that thinks dad jeans and bright white shoes are "looking good, Billy Ray!"
Don't be knockin it DT!At the same time? Oh geez, next you're going to tell me you bought an epaulet sweater!
If I elect not to receive the magazine can I get a dues credit?
I have no desire to read it and more importantly I don't understand why in the age of paperless media my union (let me rephrase "the union") spends my money to print and mail a propaganda rag...oh wait I think I just figured I out.