That's almost always how it works.The linked article only mentions the LODA being extended to owners.
Lol!! I used to fly a dude's aircam and would repeatedly and annoyingly joke about the outlandish possibility of using it for ME training...
The kit is $70k...without engines...for that thing.![]()
I wish it could be more than a sightseeing/photo platform. I want a plane like that, but it has no useful load at all and carries very little fuel.It is the coolest plane I've ever flown.
Were it not so gangly, knock-kneed, and sharp elbowed, it's performance numbers and fun factor might lead some to call it the Twin Icon.I wish it could be more than a sightseeing/photo platform. I want a plane like that, but it has no useful load at all and carries very little fuel.
Haha! Equally worthless?!Were it not so gangly, knock-kneed, and sharp elbowed, it's performance numbers and fun factor might lead some to call it the Twin Icon.
It's a LODA for owner instruction in an experimenal. This is pretty standard stuff. I'm not aware of any popular type where someone doesnt have one. In fact theres multiple for the aircam.Seeing the FAA’s record, I would advise waiting for what the Europeans have to say about certification and safety as they appear to be “The Onion” of the safety world
Right. I depends on the aircraft, but I'm not aware of a LODA for doing a rating in unless you're also an owner. Examples would be a MES in an aircam like here or a type rating in a Subsonex. IIRC, the factory built a single two seater subsonex for such purposes, but you can also do the incredibly weird "go perform the maneuvers while the examiner watches from the ground." Which I can only guess is if you don't kill yourself, you passed.It isn't always in the owner's aircraft. This guy owns two RVs and has a LODA to conduct type transition training in his airplanes. Jan Bussell Flight Training
Right. I depends on the aircraft, but I'm not aware of a LODA for doing a rating in unless you're also an owner. Examples would be a MES in an aircam like here or a type rating in a Subsonex. IIRC, the factory built a single two seater subsonex for such purposes, but you can also do the incredibly weird "go perform the maneuvers while the examiner watches from the ground." Which I can only guess is if you don't kill yourself, you passed.
Paul Dye, the former flight director of NASA built and just this year flew his subsonex. They did a write up, I just think that process is hilarious.There was a guy at my home airport that bought a Corsair, he went on to get a significant amount of dual and solo in a T6 then supervised solo in the Corsair at the airport with the instructor back on the ramp with a hand held radio.
I think you'll find that's L'OignonSeeing the FAA’s record, I would advise waiting for what the Europeans have to say about certification and safety as they appear to be “The Onion” of the safety world
Love the subsonex. Shame you need a glider rating to fly it thoughRight. I depends on the aircraft, but I'm not aware of a LODA for doing a rating in unless you're also an owner. Examples would be a MES in an aircam like here or a type rating in a Subsonex. IIRC, the factory built a single two seater subsonex for such purposes, but you can also do the incredibly weird "go perform the maneuvers while the examiner watches from the ground." Which I can only guess is if you don't kill yourself, you passed.
It's a LODA for owner instruction in an experimenal. This is pretty standard stuff. I'm not aware of any popular type where someone doesnt have one. In fact theres multiple for the aircam.
More training is almost always better than none.
Further the Europeans wont be saying anything regarding certification. Its experimental.