So, if they can't strike, which seems like it would be ideal, why don't they just quit? In any other industry (it seems), if you are getting screwed at your job, you quit and go get another one. I realize it's not quite this simple because of senority, and other things I don't know about, but man, it seems like it should be that simple.
When the excutives at United (and AA too?) took their bonuses after hosing the employees out of wages and benefits, I thought all the pilots should have walked that day. I didn't realize at the time that pilots can't strike whenever they like...but that is part of the problem IMO, don't y'all think? It seems to me, like the contracts are too restrictive in terms of protecting your rights, pay, benefits, etc... Plus, to know that the White House (regardless of who's in it) has the authority to tell the pilots that they have to work is way too big gov't for me.
It just seems to me that the unions have not provided enough flexibility and protection to their members. Again, I'm an outsider looking in.
I do not like the lesser of two evils logic when it comes to pay-cuts and benefits. What if the airline mgmt wanted more pay-cuts? More benefit cuts? For example, new FO's only make $20K/year now, so I guess they would be willing to except $10K/year because it is better than not working? That is ridiculous...it's ridiculous because pilots agree to that crap.
We need to be more like professional athletes (not by fighting dogs and using steroids) because they always look for more. When one QB gets a $10 million contract, the next QB doesn't say, "I'll do it for $6 million," but quite the contrary. The next QB says I want $12 million. We need to be like that. We need to stop accepting pay that is just insulting, and start demanding what we are worth. And just like athletes, some pilots are worth more than others, but I don't think any career pilot should be at the poverty level.