Boris Badenov
Fortis Leader
But that’s not training. That’s not making me a better, safer, more knowledgeable pilot.
The single best thing about 121 AQP (imho) is the (relatively) non-punitive LOFT component.
But that’s not training. That’s not making me a better, safer, more knowledgeable pilot.
It was an Austin software guy, his family and their nanny. He made software that de-anonymized visitors to websites and connected them to their LinkedIn profile for advertisers.So, they identified the two people up front, but I haven't heard anything about the seven other people in the back. Or did I miss that announcement?
As I said previous a few pages back. Millions of dollars spent for level D/Cs to just check boxes and customers spend thousands in “training” to sit in a 16hr class and listen to a seated instructor half falling asleep read bullet points on a slide. Pair that with the same old flight profiles you could fly in your sleep. Great value, way to keep them prepared!Rushed isn’t the word I use. Scripted, to a fault, is. There is no room for “things you want to see or do”. Even though they like to pretend the training is there for you. It’s not. It’s there to check the FAA boxes and get you to pass in the allotted time you(or your company) paid for.
I’m flying three types right now. Thankfully my company sends us to recurrent every 12 months. Which puts me in an FSI building very regularly. I’m telling you I could fly the MEM RNAV 27 circle to Rwy 18R blindfolded with a broken arm and my sisters kids climbing all over the cockpit and still nail it within standards.
But that’s not training. That’s not making me a better, safer, more knowledgeable pilot.
Let’s have an engine failure on a warm day out of Aspen and the gear won’t come up.
Let’s fly over a convective area at altitude and have an engine failure and see just how far down single engine drift down is going to be. Sure you’re clearing the tops now but what if we lost one?
Let’s do 35kt crosswind landings in COS.
Or landing in Florida in moderate rain.
Or contaminated runway simulations
Or a myriad of other scenarios that they don’t cover at all that need to be seen in a simulator before you have to go do it for real.
I feel his sentiment though. I haven’t heard yet how much time he had in type. Hopefully if this statement of his is true he wasn’t speaking about his initial type training.
Edit to add show me any 1300 pilot in their first jet that isn’t a little too reliant on the autopilot. And even if true her lack of basic flying skills don’t mean • when you don’t have a tail. Given the scenario im pretty sure Bob Hoover wasn’t getting them out of it once it turned south.
I heard it as "Jeff" and that was before I had seen names or that some people heard "Jack"The only two things that don't quite add up to me is that the girl on the radio is clearly saying "jack" instead of "Jeff" which is what's on the reporting. Also, the tail wreckage photos look suspicious. Why are the two pieces so close to each other? When I first saw that pic, I first thought "staged". Is it common for icing to directly cause the tail to come clean off within minutes?
Is it common for icing to directly cause the tail to come clean off within minutes?
Is it common for icing to directly cause the tail to come clean off within minutes?
The only two things that don't quite add up to me is that the girl on the radio is clearly saying "jack" instead of "Jeff" which is what's on the reporting. Also, the tail wreckage photos look suspicious. Why are the two pieces so close to each other? When I first saw that pic, I first thought "staged". Is it common for icing to directly cause the tail to come clean off within minutes?
Shi man, half the time I half to look at the pairing to remember the guys name sitting next to meSo, she didn’t recall the name of the captain? What’s your point?
Nobody thinks icing caused the separation of the horizontal stabilizer.
Shi man, half the time I half to look at the pairing to remember the guys name sitting next to me
The only two things that don't quite add up to me is that the girl on the radio is clearly saying "jack" instead of "Jeff" which is what's on the reporting. Also, the tail wreckage photos look suspicious. Why are the two pieces so close to each other? When I first saw that pic, I first thought "staged". Is it common for icing to directly cause the tail to come clean off within minutes?
So, she didn’t recall the name of the captain? What’s your point?
Nobody thinks icing caused the separation of the horizontal stabilizer.
Shi man, half the time I half to look at the pairing to remember the guys name sitting next to me
TRUTH
I can’t count the number of times we do a bathroom break, then I pick up the handset and think, oh crap, what’s the FOs name again?! Then do the awkwardly “hey, it’s me, I’m ready…”
But also, 99.9% of the time, I have no idea what our A FA's name is.
I write down the entire crew and place it on the center pedestal. Helps eliminate some awkwardness, helps me remember them, and also works for jumpseaters.I will say the times when a CA really makes an effort to call me by my name, I tend to pay more attention to theirs. But also, 99.9% of the time, I have no idea what our A FA's name is. Though lately, really since summer, I've had a string of trips where we keep our crew for 2 consecutive days, so it's a bit easier then.
I’ve flown with guys that do this, it always seems a little dorky to me but then I remember in the captain role being able to address people by name is probably one of those little things that goes a long way in being a good leader/team builderI write down the entire crew and place it on the center pedestal. Helps eliminate some awkwardness, helps me remember them, and also works for jumpseaters.
Everyone else on the crew gets to cheat because they can always call the boss "captain"I’ve flown with guys that do this, it always seems a little dorky to me but then I remember in the captain role being able to address people by name is probably one of those little things that goes a long way in being a good leader/team builder