Delta Air Lines worker swiped kid’s lost iPad and uploaded explicit videos of himself, lawsuit claims

Oxman

Well-Known Member
WTF is wrong with people!?



1753983255847.png


1753983399558.png


A twisted Delta Air Lines employee swiped a child’s Peppa Pig iPad left on a plane in the Big Apple — then uploaded explicit videos of him playing with himself while in uniform, according to a lawsuit.

Parents Tory and Brooke Brewer were flying from their home in South Carolina to London in July 2023 when one of their two kids left an iPad — in a pink Peppa Pig case — on the plane during a stopover at JFK Airport, according to a lawsuit they filed against Delta.

They later got random messages about activity on the device — and the “Find My” app tracked it to Jamaica, Queens, where JFK is located.

Photos then started getting synced to Tory Brewer’s iCloud, starting with selfies of a man “wearing a Delta uniform and name badge,” according to the filing — which included some blurred-out images.

But just over a month after losing the device, they started getting pornographic videos showing the man “masturbating while in his Delta uniform and wearing his Delta name badge,” according to the lawsuit.

The devious Delta employee also accessed the Brewers’ iTunes account and created their own profile — and hacked into their Amazon account, too, according to the lawsuit.

That hacked Amazon account was called “Gay” — and was first discovered by one of the Brewers’ kids, the lawsuit said.

The Brewers filed their first “lost-and-found” report with Delta the day after realizing the iPad was missing, then kept trying after realizing it was being used to upload the disturbing porn, the lawsuit said.

The only response they ever got from Delta was an automatic “no reply” email stating they were continuing to look for the iPad, the suit claimed.

The Brewers have accused Delta of negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, harassment, and even sexual assault.

They are seeking damages and accountability from the airline, alleging Delta failed to respond meaningfully to their concerns.

Delta said it is aware of the lawsuit.

“The accused individual is not a Delta employee but one of a vendor company,” an airline spokesperson told The Post in a statement, without identifying the employee.
 
I posted this elsewhere, but it works all the same:

You could spend the next two hours reading about all of the clergy, politicians and teachers that were arrested for crimes against kids this week alone.

We are also a country led by a man who was found liable in court for sexual assault.

If you're shocked, it's because you haven't been paying attention.
 
“The accused individual is not a Delta employee but one of a vendor company,” an airline spokesperson told The Post in a statement, without identifying the employee.

Hilarious excuse given that Delta contracted with that vendor in the first place.
 
I posted this elsewhere, but it works all the same:

You could spend the next two hours reading about all of the clergy, politicians and teachers that were arrested for crimes against kids this week alone.

We are also a country led by a man who was found liable in court for sexual assault.

If you're shocked, it's because you haven't been paying attention.
We keep associating these acts with certain groups of people. I think the only thing in common is that they are usually men.
 
Doesn't matter. The passenger purchased their ticket to travel on Delta.

Exactly, outsource to save money you gotta take the bad that comes with it. New lawsuit dropped related to YYZ crash

A flight attendant awarded for her heroism after the Delta Air Lines crash in Toronto earlier this year is now suing the company, alleging it "cut corners on safety" and knowingly put passengers at risk, CBC News has learned.

 
We keep associating these acts with certain groups of people. I think the only thing in common is that they are usually men.
Statistically more often then not as you say, it is a certain racial demographic, over others. From my years of experiencing working with adolescent offenders I'd agree. From what I'm seeing first hand is that it's a lot of suburban boys becoming offenders. They start off watching porn at a young age, and quickly escalate to offending on someone, when masturbation gets old, and doesn't do it for them anymore. Reading history charts at work, we do still get kids that were touched by a family member, a family friend, someone in a position of trust/power. Who're repeating the cycle and transitioning from victim to predator. But a lot of cases lately are stemming from porn over the past five years, especially during COVID, with the genesis of their sexual offenses having started with porn.
 
Man imagine stealing something, then getting caught red handed (literally) months later because you were too stupid to remove your ID before jacking it.

Some people don’t deserve freedom.
These types of individuals sociopaths/psychopaths, have a far higher threshold for excitement and experience it more intensely, than normal individuals. Often leading them to extreme risk-taking and dangerous behaviors. I.E. they don't think, they're super impulsive and allow their urges/emotions to control them and don't worry, or think about consequences before doing something. It's typically an after thought, if at all.
 
.......They start off watching porn at a young age, and quickly escalate to offending on someone, when masturbation gets old, and doesn't do it for them anymore.......

Be careful now, you'll be labeled a christo-nationalist religious nut job for advocating that maybe children shouldn't have unlimited access to porn.
 
Be careful now, you'll be labeled a christo-nationalist religious nut job for advocating that maybe children shouldn't have unlimited access to porn.
By which you’re implying that there are people advocating for children to have unlimited access to porn.

I’d have ask for your sources on that one.





(If there are such sources I’d offer odds that they’re “christo-nationalistic” in nature.)
 
By which you’re implying that there are people advocating for children to have unlimited access to porn.

I’d have ask for your sources on that one.





(If there are such sources I’d offer odds that they’re “christo-nationalistic” in nature.)
I sure see a lot of complaints about age verification on any given comment section about pornhub or onlyfans when such things are applied or some state votes to limit access, and it's attack on free speech/expression. Maybe not here so much.....maybe.
 
Be careful now, you'll be labeled a christo-nationalist religious nut job for advocating that maybe children shouldn't have unlimited access to porn.
I get your sarcasm. But realistically, the only individual who would want a child to watch porn, would be someone grooming said child. But then TN. state Republicans, had a bill on their records, wanting to make it legal to have underage child brides. But Democrats are the groomers...
 
Last edited:
I get your sarcasm. But realistically, the only individual who would want a child to watch porn, would be someone grooming said child. But then TN. state Republicans, had a bill on their records, wanting to make it legal to have underage child brides. But Democrats are the groomers...
Then why are age verification laws just a religious overtake of the government?
 
I don't know what you're talking about. I'm forty-nine, there has always been age verification requirements to create an account on a porn site. This isn't anything new.
Not that many years ago you could watch pornhub without logging in to anything. Free unlimited access to anyone with access to internet and knew how to spell pornhub in a google search.

Today there are now 25 states that have laws that prohibit that kind of access.

And yet;

"....age verification laws have been condemned by adult websites who argue they’re part of a larger anti-sex political movement. They’ve also garnered opposition from groups that advocate for digital privacy and free speech, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The group has argued that it is impossible to ensure websites don’t retain user data, regardless of whether age verification laws require they delete it. Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the nonprofit Center for Democracy & Technology, said the court’s decision on age verification “does far more than uphold an incidental burden on adults’ speech. It overturns decades of precedent and has the potential to upend access to First Amendment-protected speech on the internet for everyone, children and adults alike.” “Age verification requirements still raise serious privacy and free expression concerns,” Jain added. “If states are to go forward with these burdensome laws, age verification tools must be accurate and limit collection, sharing, and retention of personal information, particularly sensitive information like birthdate and biometric data.”"



The other 25 states its still the girls gone wild west. For everyone.
 
Back
Top