How Many Pair(s) of Underwear Do You Wear Per Trip?

How Many Pair(s) of Underwear Do You Wear Per Trip?

  • One

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • One per day

    Votes: 17 53.1%
  • If the flying gets dicey at least one per day

    Votes: 1 3.1%
  • Underwear? What's underwear?

    Votes: 5 15.6%
  • I check the weather on my company issued iPad in the hotel van

    Votes: 10 31.3%

  • Total voters
    32
I have two pairs of magic underwear. Each one is very situational. The thong gives me a +1 to charisma. The briefs are pretty cool. They or magically dirty and offers advantage on all intimidation rolls.

I think it's possible that the thong gives you -4 to perception instead.... :P

The dirty briefs do grant a nice area-effect knockback though, I'd imagine.
 
Be honest. All you one shirt wonders, do you even know what underwear is? Probably pack none. “Hey, I’m already wearing one on day 1!”

Right? RIGHT?
 
HAHAHAHA…HAHAHA…o_O

Per day, as in Julian Day? Zulu? One Jupiter Day?

haha it is amazing that you just brought the Julian calendar into this thread. Yes, there is still an input in my aircraft for JD. And yes, it is still listed on both the flight schedule, as well as numerous student generated kneeboard cards. I have yet to understand how this calendar system is useful to anyone.
 
haha it is amazing that you just brought the Julian calendar into this thread. Yes, there is still an input in my aircraft for JD. And yes, it is still listed on both the flight schedule, as well as numerous student generated kneeboard cards. I have yet to understand how this calendar system is useful to anyone.
Is that a hold over from celestial nav?
 
You laugh... I've flown at an airline that had underwear in the uniform policy in the FOM.
I don't recall if PSA had one or not. But I did have a FA get on once and said she wanted to do a uniform compliance check starting with an underwear check. We all got a good laugh at that.
 
I don't recall if PSA had one or not. But I did have a FA get on once and said she wanted to do a uniform compliance check starting with an underwear check. We all got a good laugh at that.

PSA had language in the FOM recommending cotton undergarments due to the danger of synthetics melting during a fire. Of course they gave us polyester pants.

Years ago there was one FA who refused to wear tights or hose under her skirt (or the mumu they used to have). The base manager was always yelling at her but I don't think anything ever happened from it.
 
Is that a hold over from celestial nav?

Great question. Only application I've ever seen it used is by the mx department. Who finally no longer seem to want it used as DTG for our flight logs. But it is still the flight date format used on their hard paper copies (when used uncommonly). I think it is more likely a holdover from this, before we had computers, and always filled out the DD form post flight. Mil loves a good tradition, even when it no longer makes any sense. Most/many Navy aviation squadron maintenance control desks still keep a flip card Julian calendar prominently on the wall for this reason, which is total insanity in my mind.
 
Great question. Only application I've ever seen it used is by the mx department. Who finally no longer seem to want it used as DTG for our flight logs. But it is still the flight date format used on their hard paper copies (when used uncommonly). I think it is more likely a holdover from this, before we had computers, and always filled out the DD form post flight. Mil loves a good tradition, even when it no longer makes any sense. Most/many Navy aviation squadron maintenance control desks still keep a flip card Julian calendar prominently on the wall for this reason, which is total insanity in my mind.
Interesting. Who knew? I guess it makes sense from an MX perspective singe a Julian date is mostly just a count of elapsed days. If you have a right up that's good for 120 days, JD would be a lot more accurate, or easier to determine the 120 day mark than the Gregorian calendar with the later having months that have between 28-31 days in them.
 
Interesting. Who knew? I guess it makes sense from an MX perspective singe a Julian date is mostly just a count of elapsed days. If you have a right up that's good for 120 days, JD would be a lot more accurate, or easier to determine the 120 day mark than the Gregorian calendar with the later having months that have between 28-31 days in them.

yeah you could be onto something with this
 
Back
Top