DispatcherSam
Well-Known Member
All employees temporarily laid off.
This was my first airline, and it’s hard to watch.
Official letter from the CEO
This was my first airline, and it’s hard to watch.
Official letter from the CEO
That is a good question...But... but... How is the Pepsi going to get to the villages??
If only there were other companies with sleds to haul triple mailers!But... but... How is the Pepsi going to get to the villages??
Lmao, how on earth would they do that?State Police could takeover. Might as well as they could transport criminals too. ASP ConCargo Express
I mean, if pepsi is $400 a case, I can probably be persuaded to fly some out.But... but... How is the Pepsi going to get to the villages??
$400 a case or $400 a triple mailer?I mean, if pepsi is $400 a case, I can probably be persuaded to fly some out.
Lmao, how on earth would they do that?
But... but... How is the Pepsi going to get to the villages??
90 hour pilots flying a 182 under 91 is a wildly different thing then a DHC-8 under 121. At least up here, there's a reason the troopers die in airplanes constantly.They already do...
90 hour pilots flying a 182 under 91 is a wildly different thing then a DHC-8 under 121. At least up here, there's a reason the troopers die in airplanes constantly.
90 hour pilots flying a 182 under 91 is a wildly different thing then a DHC-8 under 121. At least up here, there's a reason the troopers die in airplanes constantly.
Oh, I think if it's government use 100% it falls outside 14 CFR. Something like public use, I forget what it's called exactly. But that does not in the slightest lend itself to safety. Our troopers up here are horrific pilots by and large, have so little flight time they can't even legally fly for hire under 135. And it shows in their accident record.It wouldn’t be 91 if the State Police owned any aircraft and used it for the sole purpose of transport of prisoners and nothing else?
It’s not like they are leasing like a charter. It’d be like a business that owns its own jet (and yeah I know State Police isn’t a business).
(Serious question as I don’t know how it would work)
Oh, I think if it's government use 100% it falls outside 14 CFR. Something like public use, I forget what it's called exactly. But that does not in the slightest lend itself to safety. Our troopers up here are horrific pilots by and large, have so little flight time they can't even legally fly for hire under 135. And it shows in their accident record.
It wouldn’t be 91 if the State Police owned any aircraft and used it for the sole purpose of transport of prisoners and nothing else?
It’s not like they are leasing like a charter. It’d be like a business that owns its own jet (and yeah I know State Police isn’t a business).
(Serious question as I don’t know how it would work)
More likely under public use title 49 then title 14.Most likely 125.
EAS is massive in AK. It is actually the only way to that place though. Well, most of them.Anyone know how much the subsidies are for these services to operate in Alaska? My state gets like $24M/yr in EAS subsidies to have Skywest fly empty CRJ200’s daily. One exception; I think one airport flies Caravans to ORD and MSP daily for a $3.5M/yr subsidy. If you do the math, the money is enough to cover the operating cost. Every nickel they charge is pure profit for the operator. I’m willing to bet the Alaskan subsidies are just as fat. At least they have an argument that flying is the only way to move in and out. In Michigan, you’ll have three airports served by Skywest that are within an 80-min commute.