Fuel Burn of the ERJ145 and CRJ200

A Matt

New Member
I am working on a project to compare the fuel burn of CRJ200s, ERJ145s, Saab340s and ATRs (42s and 72s). Obviously the turboprops burn less fuel, but I want to understand exactly how much less. I would really appreciate any information on average hourly fuel burn on any of the noted types. Also - would love to get any other operating information. If you have flown the type - was it generally reliable or was it always in the hangar. Many thanks in advance.
 
What I remember (I think) specifically was that the 200 burned about 40lbs a minute in the hold. That's what I remember using as a calculator for how long I could hold. It was reliable but it sucked. Sucked bad.
 
Ugh, people can't just give a straight answer.

CRJ-200: 1550pph per side in cruise, ~3100pph total.

The only turboprop I know, Q400: 1250pph per side, ~2500 total.
 
From my poor fuzzy memory

BE-1900 19 pax ~500-550lb/hr (1000-1100lb/hr total)

Emb-145. 50 pax ~1250-1300lb/hr in cruise (2500-2600lb/hr total)
Crj-700 65 pax 1600lb/hr in cruise (3200lb/hr total)

320NEO 182 pax 2000-2200lb/hr (4000-4400lb/hr total)
320CEO 182 pax 2400-2600lb/hr (4800-5200lb/hr total)

of course it varies by aircraft load cruise altitude cruise speed etc but those are rough averages from what I've seen.

Maybe you are looking for the cruise performance tables?
 
The CRJ-200 burns around 3000lbs an hour average. Once at cruise you can get it down to around 2500lb/hr or so depending on your speed.
 
Not familiar with any of those but if you want to add the Dash 8-200 and -300 to your comparison about 1600pph in cruise seems to be normal.
 
Let me use my indoc knowledge

1050 lbs = 30 mins CRJ2
1500 lbs CRJ7
1550 lbs CRJ9

That's probably worth nothing though. Just wanted to refresh my brain and type it out again so I don't forget it.
 
If you are good at math, you can figure out the Saab fuel burn care of Silver's design firm.
d7536e421025508d0c875de9b162a01f7eb97da2.jpg
 
Back
Top