Signing Bonuses or Turd Sandwich

MOGuy424

Well-Known Member
Could we start a thread addressing this ridiculousness of the Signing/retention bonuses? While I do not have all the facts and am still 100% unclear how these work or why they are better then upping first year pay, it seems like a scam to me.

From what I know, and believe me, I appear to know than what you might think I do not know that I know =o). But these signing and retention bonuses seem like:

1) They are company instituted and not blessed by the union, so my understanding is that these can go just as easily as they came. Why are the unions not fighting the company on these and demanding better first year pay and contracts?

2) My other understanding (or misunderstanding) are that these bonuses can be subject to almost as much at 40% tax rates, thus a 20k bonus works out closer to 11k (turd sandwich)

I pulled this from the IRS Q&A site so this along with others just telling me that they are highly taxed is the source of my understanding:

"The IRS has rules for withholding on "supplemental wages" - which includes bonus payments - that differ from their withholding rules on regular wages. Assuming that your bonus was less than $1 million, the employer has a choice of withholding a flat 25%, or combining the bonus with the regular wages, computing the withholding as though that were a single payment, subtracting out what would have been withheld from the regular wages, and withholding the remaining amount from the bonus payment. The method chosen depends on the employer's payroll system but will typically be higher than your normal withholding rate. The employer will also withhold Social Security and Medicare (combined rate of 7.65%) and state taxes, which is probably what pushes the total withholding close to 50%".

If anyone with knowledge can chime in I'd appreciate it. And if this is truth then new FO's really need to see the bonuses for what they are, turd sandwiches.

Cheers!;)
 
This is exactly how rumors get started. You claim "ridiculousness," but you then use phrases like "my other understanding...or misunderstanding is..."

I can only speak for Endeavor, which I am on a LTLOA from. So, here is the case there: the bonuses are part of a letter of agreement(LOA) with the union. This makes them part of our contract and obviously "blessed" by the union. Your second point regarding taxes is dead wrong. Your quote from the IRS's website is only referencing withholding, and not about how much taxes you ultimately owe at the end of the year. The withholding will likely be higher, but when you pay taxes at the end of the year, the standard formula will be used based on your income.
 
So you are saying that the company MUST pay out these bonuses for, example in Endeavors case, 4 year retention bonuses. There is absolutely, positively, 150% chance they can recant on these unlike say and negotiated hourly increase. Btw, is that ETD still around?
 
The first thing that you need to learn is that nothing is ever "absolutely, positively, 150%" in the airline business. Yes, even contracts change or are violated wantonly.

Second thing to learn: never believe rumors that you hear from pilots. If a pilot tells you something like "bonuses are taxed higher," talk to a CPA. Pilots fly airplanes. They know a lot about that, but very little about most else.
 
Well nothing is 100%, but it is part of our contract. For instance, if we are pulled back into bankruptcy this, along with any other area of the contract, could be tossed out by a bankruptcy judge. I just did another glance over the LOA and I didn't see anything that seemed like an "obvious" way of getting out of it.
 
There is no LOA regarding new-hire bonuses. They are considered pre-employment which means the union has nothing to do with it. The companies love them because they don't have to permanently raise pay and can shut off the bonus flow whenever they feel like they're hiring enough.
 
Great information guys, thanks for your input! It just seems like bonuses are a temporary detour around contract negotiations for actual better pay and contracts. Fly safe!
 
Bonuses are by default withheld differently than regular pay. They do not change your actual tax rate any more than an equivalent change in your regular wage would.
 
Bonuses are by default withheld differently than regular pay.

Even this isn't necessarily true. It depends on how your company codes it when they send it to ADP or Paychex. If they code it as a special bonus, what you say is true. If they just code it as additional compensation, even on a separate line item, it's not true, though. AirTran paid contract signing bonuses as regular compensation, not as bonus compensation. Normal withholding rules applied. The union leadership should try to get this information from the company prior to the payout so that people can be informed as to how it's going to work.
 
Even this isn't necessarily true. It depends on how your company codes it when they send it to ADP or Paychex. If they code it as a special bonus, what you say is true. If they just code it as additional compensation, even on a separate line item, it's not true, though. AirTran paid contract signing bonuses as regular compensation, not as bonus compensation. Normal withholding rules applied. The union leadership should try to get this information from the company prior to the payout so that people can be informed as to how it's going to work.
Gotcha.
 
There is no LOA regarding new-hire bonuses. They are considered pre-employment which means the union has nothing to do with it. The companies love them because they don't have to permanently raise pay and can shut off the bonus flow whenever they feel like they're hiring enough.
I was going to say... Why on earth would competent union leadership sign an LOA for new-hire bonuses (and why would the pilot group vote for it)? That'd be huge leverage to bring them to the table for improvements elsewhere.
 
Back
Top